- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
心室起搏管理模式(MVP)对右心室流出道间隔部起搏患者心功能影响.doc
双腔起搏器最小化心室起搏策略对心衰患者心功能的影响
摘要 目的:比较自动房室搜索(Search AV)和心室起搏管理(managed ventricular pacing,MVP)模式下,双腔起搏器植入的心衰患者其心功能变化情况。方法:选取58例因病态窦房结综合征植入双腔起搏器的患者,采用右心室流出道起搏方式,随机分为Search AV组和MVP组,植入起搏器后分别启用Search AV模式和MVP模式,随访12个月,比较两组心室起搏比例差异以及术前及术后12个月心功能指标和血浆NT-ProBNP水平差异。结果:MVP组心室起搏比例较Search AV组心室起搏比例明显减少(0.5% vs 4.2%,P 0.01);Search AV组左室射血分数术后下降、E/A比值下降,而MVP组射血分数及E/A比值的变化没有统计学意义。两组患者术后12个月NT-ProBNP较术前均有所增加,SearchAV组较MVP组增加更为明显(456pg/ml vs 258pg/ml,P<0.05)。结论:对于病态窦房结综合征植入双腔起搏器的心衰患者,右心室流出道起搏状态下,MVP模式较Search AV模式对患者长期的心脏收缩和舒张功能影响较小。
关键词 心室起搏管理 自动房室搜索 心力衰竭 心脏功能
Impacts of different strategies to minimizing ventricular pacing on patients with heart failure
Abstract Objective:To evaluate cardiac function changes in patients of heart failure, who received dual chamber pacemaker implantation between two algorithms: managed ventricular pacing(MVP) and search atria ventricle(Search AV) because of sick sinus syndrome. Methods: A total of 58 patients received permanent dual chamber pacemaker for sick sinus syndrome were divided into MVP group and Search AV group randomly. Managed ventricular pacing or search atria ventricle algorithms were used accordingly after the pacemaker were implanted. The percentages of ventricular pacing,index of echocardiography and plasma NT-ProBNP were recorded before the operations and after 12 months follow-up. Results: The percentages of ventricular pacing was lower in MVP group than in Search AV group(0.5% vs 4.2%,P 0.01).The LVEF falled and the E/A ratio decreased in the Search AV group after 12 months follow-up, yet the MVP group had no statistically significant changes. The plasma NT-ProBNP increased in both groups and the Search AV group increased more(456pg/ml vs 258pg/ml,P<0.05). Conclusion: MVP algorithm has less influence than Search AV algorithm on the patients’heart systolic and diastolic functions, who had heart failure and received dual chamber pacemaker implantation because of sick sinus syndrome.
Key words: managed ventricular pacing;
原创力文档


文档评论(0)