两种油水分离旋流器的数值模拟对比分析冯浦涌1，丁文刚1，梁冰2，刘.docVIP

两种油水分离旋流器的数值模拟对比分析 冯浦涌1，丁文刚1，梁冰2，刘琳2，程国锋3 (1中海油田服务股份有限公司油田生产事业部天津 300459；2东北石油大学大庆 163318； 3川庆钻探公司长庆石油工程监督公司陕西 西安 710021） 摘 要：计算流体力学（CFD）关键词：；旋流器；分离 Comparative Analysis of Numerical Simulation of Two Kinds of Cyclone Structures FENG Puyong1,DING Wengang1,LIANG Bing2,LIU Lin2,CHENG Guofeng3 (1China Oilfield Services Ltd.(COSL Production Optimization),Tianjin 300459,China； 2； ’an 710021, China) Abstract: As one of the important aspects of environmental pollution, oily wastewater has a serious impact on the current environment. Therefore, the treatment of oily wastewater is a problem that cannot be ignored or avoided. Cyclone separator is an efficient and energy-saving new equipment to enter the industrial application stage of oily wastewater treatment.In this paper, the method of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is used to compare and analyze the pressure of two kinds of cyclone separator, the efficiency curve of the axial velocity distribution and variable flow rate. The results show that: In the upper part of the swirl cavity and the large cone segment, the internal inverted cone of cyclone separator with the same outlet direction, cyclone separator with the same outlet direction has little effect on the tangent velocity. In the lower part of the large cone segment, the tangential velocity of double cone hydrocyclone decreased rapidly from the sectionⅡ, while the inverted cone structure of cyclone separator with the same outlet direction kept the tangent velocity at a higher level; The axial velocity of double cone hydrocyclone is greater than that of cyclone separator with the same outlet direction in the swirl cavity and the large cone segment, and the inverted cone structure of cyclone separator with the same outlet direction does not increase the axial velocity, but the effect of the cone structure on tangential velocity is more obvious;Cyclone separator with the same outlet direction the underflow exit section size is smaller than double cone hydrocyclone,