经济法论文-政府定价景区收费行为的性质认定.doc

精品文档 可编辑 题 目：政府定价景区收费行为的性质认定 ——以凤凰古城为例 目 录 引言·····························································1 一、凤凰古城县政府对古城景区收费的主体资格认定问题···············2 （一）、经济法主体的概述·········································2 （二）、凤凰县政府的经济法主体资格及其行为的合法性问题···········3 二、政府定价行为的界定问题·······································3 （一）、如何界定经营者的定价范围和政府的定价范围·················3 （二）、如何确保政府定价的合法性及合理性·························3 三、凤凰古城政府定价收费中的宏观调控问题·························4 （一）、政府宏观调控的概述·······································4 （二）、凤凰古城对景区定价收费是否在其调控范围内·················4 （三）、凤凰古城收费对其政府财政的影响···························5 结语·····························································5 参考文献·························································6 致谢·····························································6 可编辑 政府定价景区收费行为的性质认定 ——以凤凰古城为例 林浩* * 作者简介：林 浩（1991——）， 男，华侨大学法学院2011级本科生，学号：1117115022。 摘要：凤凰古城，沈从文的故乡，属于凤凰人民，但凤凰县政府一纸文书，规定对进入凤凰的旅游者收费148元，其中60元归政府，是否合法？是否合理？收费的消息传出，舆论热议纷纷。近年来，景区门票价格上涨一直是牵动公众敏感神经的话题之一。凤凰古城开始实行“景区收费”，改变以往的“景点收费”模式，而这背后则是当地政府的行为所致，政府将凤凰古城的土地 出售给开发商，并参与经济利润的收取，名义上是作为财政收费，维护古城的修护保护，然而这种收费行为却为许多人带来了不便，作为古城内的居民生活不便，网上甚至出现了“收费的凤凰不如鸡”、“好女不嫁凤凰男”等说法，凤凰古城称这是“为规范市场”“保护游客利益”“政府会帮助商户渡过难关”，冠冕堂皇的解释之下，到底是不是与民争利的事实。究其本质，政府的这种行为性质如何界定，政府是否有权进行收费，在凤凰古城收费面临法律伦理的双重考量之下，从经济法的角度对这一行为的认定，深入了解凤凰古城收费问题的本质。 关键词：凤凰古城收费： 经济主体资格： 政府定价： 宏观调控 Government pricing behavior of the nature of the identified scenic fees —— FENGHUANG Case Abstract:Phoenix city, Shen Congwens hometown, the people belonging to the Phoenix, but Phoenix county government a piece of paper, provides for tourists to enter the Phoenix charges 148 yuan, of which 60 yuan owned by the government, is legitimate? Reasonable? Pay the news, public opinion have been hot. In recent years, the area has been a rise in ticket price sensitive nerves affecting the public one of the topics. Phoenix city began to implement sce