ASME中UT代替RT的探讨.docVIP

ASME中UT代替RT的探讨 ASME UT instead of RT in one, the root of the problem In Saudi Arabia program execution is ASME standard, on the question of whether or not to UT instead of RT to communicate with the owners several times, ha.ven，t approved. Isnt it true that the UT is unreliable? Unreliable, why is it that ASME and UT can replace the RT term? Am I missing out on some of the terms that UT replaces RT? In order to solve this mystery, I kept looking for the criteria and found no infornidtion in my existing ASME data? Finally, it will be concluded that the work will be done in the future? 2, ASME each chapter UT instead of RT 1, ASME the ith and ASME VIII - 1/2 volume In the ASME the volume I, ASME VIII UT instead of RT in part 1 and part 2 of explanation, is not in the chapter of ASME, but in the case of 2235 using ultrasonic testing instead of radiographic testing, this case is approval on October 23, 1996, and after many changes, now with derivative to the 2235-9. I have only 2235-8 in my hand, and the ASME committee has a detailed explanation. Committee recommended material thickness is greater than or equal to 13 mm of boiler and pressure vessel we 1 d can use ultrasonic (UT) method instead of ray (RT) method, and shall meet the following requirements: a) when the material thickness is greater than 200 mm, ultrasonic detection region should in elude the entire weld and we 1 d on both sides of the range of 50 mm. When the thickness of the material is less than or equal to 200mm, the ultrasonic testing area shall include the entire we 1 d and the 25mm or the thickness of the material on either side of the we1d. Or, detection area can be reduced to we1d and weld on both sides of the actual heat affected zone (HAZ) plus 6 mm, and meet the following requirements: 1) the we 1 d heat affected zone of HAZ by actual measurement, and has a record of welding technology. 2) ultrasonic probe position dnd seanning device with reference marks (paint or light steel seal along the