EGFR-TKI靶向治疗非小细胞肺癌研究进展.ppt

EGFR-TKI靶向治疗非小细胞肺癌研究进展.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共68页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
ISEL (IRESSA Survival Evaluation in Lung cancer), a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre, Phase III trial, was designed to investigate the effect on survival of gefitinib 250 mg/day plus best supportive care (BSC) in patients with NSCLC who were refractory to, or intolerant of, their most recent chemotherapy regimen.1 The primary endpoint of ISEL was survival in the overall and adenocarcinoma patient populations. Secondary endpoints included time to treatment failure (TTF), ORR, QoL and symptom improvement and safety. Eligible patients were 18 years old, had received 1 or 2 prior therapies for NSCLC, and were refractory to or intolerant of their most recent chemotherapy regimen. Patients were stratified initially according to tumour histology, sex, smoking history, number of prior chemotherapy regimens, reason for failure of prior chemotherapy and performance status (PS). Prior to unblinding, the following additional patient subgroups were added to the statistically rigorous subgroup analysis: prior docetaxel treatment; age at randomisation; time from diagnosis to treatment; racial origin; and best response to prior chemotherapy. Patients were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive gefitinib or placebo, and received BSC according to local practice. At a median follow-up of 7.2 months (range 3-15 months), 976 deaths had occurred in the ISEL trial and the total mortality rate was 58%. In the overall population the improvement in survival with IRESSA did not reach statistical significance compared with placebo (Log-rank hazard ratio [HR] 0.89; 95% [CI] 0.77, 1.02; p=0.087).1 However, a supportive Cox proportional hazards analysis suggested statistical significance in favour of IRESSA (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.76, 0.99; p=0.030). Median survival in the overall population was 5.6 months for IRESSA compared with 5.1 months for placebo.1 Estimated 1-year survival rates for IRESSA and placebo were 27% and 21%, respectively, in the overall po

文档评论(0)

peace0308 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档