基于补丁结构化图形比较的漏洞发掘技术-计算机系统结构专业论文.docxVIP

基于补丁结构化图形比较的漏洞发掘技术-计算机系统结构专业论文.docx

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
II II Abstract During software development, using unsafe codes led to the existence of many different types and causes of the vulnerabilities. Analyzing and preventing these vulnerabilities can effectively maintain system security. To these vulnerabilities, security researchers have put forward many ways to explore and develop the corresponding debugging tools. Because of continually improving the ability and speed to analyze vulnerabilities, software developers began to close the technical details about vulnerabilities, but only provided a corresponding patch file. As a result, vulnerabilities-mining technology based on analysis of patch file became an important vulnerabilities-mining technology. The technology can be effective used to find the differences of software between before and after patching. Thereby obtain the details information of vulnerabilities which be patched. So it is a hot topic in the sphere of information security, and has significance in virus mutation analysis, the use vulnerabilities. In response to the technology, contrasted several major mining techniques, based on classification of vulnerabilities and the analysis of structural graphics, the vulnerabilities mining techniques based on comparison of structural graphics of patches is put forward. The technology compares between different versions of the same file, and makes use of semantic differences of before and after patching to find different areas, thereby positions the location where vulnerabilities occurs. The method is based on structural graphics. Based on the original method, structural signature of call graph was used to compare nodes firstly, and structural signature of control flow graph was combined to match nodes secondly. Then, according to the smallest product of prime numbers, it do further comparison in not-matching nodes. Adoption of the above three steps of the match, it can position the differences between execute codes and complete analysis. Key words: patch, vulnerab

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

131****9843 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档