解雇权限制制度之研究-法律·经济法(劳动法)专业论文.docxVIP

解雇权限制水平朴I剥傲高。第三章透视我田解庭权限制制度的缺陷及其原因。本章通过“我国解雇制 解雇权限制水平朴I剥傲高。 第三章透视我田解庭权限制制度的缺陷及其原因。本章通过“我国解雇制 度的缺陷”和“原因探析”两节，分析我国的解雇权限制水平尽管不低，但是由 于我国从计划经济体制走过来实行市场经济后，对雇主经营管理权的限制虽然有 所松动，但又与成熟的市场经济固家的实践不完全相同，同时存在着对雇主解雇 权在立法上的较高限制和实践中解雇权被滥用．劳动者合法权益屡遭侵犯的现 实。 第四章完善我国解雇权限制制度的建议。本章提出了通过规范雇主解雇 权、合理限制雇主解雇权，降低劳动合同解除难度，使劳动者获得经济补偿和法 律救济：扩大不定期劳动合I司的范围、限制定期劳动合同的签订范围和期限，以 期完善我国的解雇权限制制度。 关键词：解雇、解雇白山、限制解雇权滥用、解雇权限制制度、解雇原因、 通知期、代替通知金、 不定期劳动合同 Abstract in Engl i sh Di smi ssal i 1-()rill 0f the termi nation of employmen L contract abroad whereas in China the re]ease and the termination of the emp Joyment contract are two different concepts in essence and in some degree dj smissal in Chi empIoyer’s right to rei ieve the empleymen L contract unijateraIly．Sj nee the establi shment of marke L economy i our country．the system 0f 1abor USj ng has changed a lot from planning labor use in instruction of the state i n the time of P1anning economy i Lo present market OFi enLed 1abet use．Therefore employers have more freedom to decide employment，moreover freedom to dismiSS has become the domai of employers’management power．Meanwhil e sinee work iS a means of security of empIoyees’SUUVival interest．Freedom to dismiSS wi儿to some extent directlY depr J or threaten employees’surv i val interest． Freedom to di smi SS and 1 imi lati On on the abuse of di smi ssaI ri ght have always been the COnt roversial topi CS i the arena of theory．Legi Slation of of countries around the worh!has al SO been continuouslY seeking to keep the balante between protection of eoonomiC interests of cap J tal and that of survivalInterest of empIoyees．Due to the particularity of economic redundancy．the thesiS wil 1 onl Y focus on the situations prescribed in Article 25 and ArtiCle 26 of Labor Law to compare di smissal protection system of China with that of five other countries 1ike the U．K．，USA， France，6ermany and japan．By such comparison，it’S obvious that our dismissal protection has stayed on higher 1 evel but there stili exist some defi