循证_护理在高龄眼科门诊患者中的应用效果.docVIP

循证_护理在高龄眼科门诊患者中的应用效果.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
word格式可编辑 专业资料整理 循证护理在高龄眼科门诊患者中的应用效果   [摘要] 目的 探讨循证护理在高龄眼科门诊患者中的应用效果。 方法 2015年10~11月我院收治372例高龄眼科门诊患者分为常规护理组(n=185)和循证护理组(n=187)。比较两组患者焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分、生活质量指数、护理满意度的差异。 结果 两组患者护理前SAS评分、SDS评分差异均无统计学意义(P0.05);两组患者护理后SAS评分、SDS评分均显著低于护理前(P0.05);护理后循证护理组SAS评分、SDS评分均显著低于常规护理组。循证护理组身体功能评分、角色功能评分、情绪功能、总体质量评分均显著优于常规护理组(P0.05)。循证护理组护理满意率显著高于常规护理组(91.44% vs 73.51%,P=0.000)。 结论 循证护理改善高龄眼科门诊患者不良情绪和生活质量,有助于提升护理满意率。   [关键词] 循证护理;眼科;门诊;高龄;应用   [中图分类号] R816.97 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2016)03(c)-0195-04   [Abstract] Objective To investigate the application effects of evidence-based care on the aged outpatients in the department of ophthalmology. Methods 372 aged outpatients in the department of ophthalmology in our hospital from October to November 2015 were selected and divided into conventional care group (n=185) and evidence-based care group (n=187).The differences of self-rating anxiety scale (SAS),self-rating depression scale (SDS),life-quality indexes and the satisfaction of care of the patients from both groups were analyzed. Results The SAS,SDS,life-quality indexes and satisfaction of the two groups before the care had no statistical differences (P0.05).The SAS,SDS,life-quality indexes and satisfaction of the two group after the care was significantly lower than that before the care respectively (P0.05).After the care,patients in evidence-based care group had significant lower SAS grades and SDS grades than patients in conventional care group.The score of body function,role function,emotional function and overall quality in the evidence-based care group was significantly better than that of conventional care group respectively (P0.05).The satisfaction of evidence-based care were significantly higher than that of control group (91.44% vs 73.51%,P=0.000). Conclusion Evidence-based care can significantly improve the unhealthy emotion and life quality of the aged outpatients in the department of ophthalmology

文档评论(0)

dwh0909 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档