网站大量收购闲置独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

人工晶体计算公式在正常眼轴合并浅前房白内 障患者中的准确性比较.pdfVIP

人工晶体计算公式在正常眼轴合并浅前房白内 障患者中的准确性比较.pdf

  1. 1、本文档共7页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Advances in Clinical Medicine 临床医学进展, 2018, 8(2), 210-216 Published Online April 2018 in Hans. /journal/acm /10.12677/acm.2018.82036 Accuracy of Various Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas in Shallow Anterior Chamber Patients with Normal Axial Length 1,2 2 2 2 Liying Bing , Guibo Liu , Yuna Ma , Lin Leng 1 Medical College of Qingdao University, Qingdao Shandong 2 Department of Ophthalmology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao Shandong rd th rd Received: Mar. 23 , 2018; accepted: Apr. 16 , 2018; published: Apr. 23 , 2018 Abstract Objective: To compare the accuracy of five intraocular lens calculation formulas (Haigis, SRK II, Hoffer Q, Holladay1 and SRK/T) in shallow anterior chamber patients with normal axial length. Methods: 45 patients who underwent uncomplicated cataract surgery were involved in this re- trospective analysis. This study was performed in the Department of Ophthalmology at the Affi- liated Hospital of Qingdao University from January 2016 to October 2017. The IOL Master was used to predict the refractive outcomes for five formulas. Actual postoperative refractions were taken on 3 to 8 weeks after surgery. Refractive error and absolute refractive error were calculated. The SPSS19.0 was used for statistical analysis to compare the refractive errors, absolute refractive errors and the refractive error distribution of different IOL formulas. Results: The mean refractive error of the Haigis formula (–0.13 ± 0.76 D) differed significantly from Hoffer Q (–0.34 ± 0

文档评论(0)

ldj215323 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档