以农立国还是以工立国民国时期立国之争的再思考.docx

以农立国还是以工立国民国时期立国之争的再思考.docx

  1. 1、本文档共14页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
“以农立国”还是“以工立国” ? 民国时期立国之争的再思考 禹思恬周建波梁银鹤 北京大学经济学院 摘要: 20世纪二三十年代,屮国岀现了一次关于“何以立国”的争论,争论的核心是 “以工立国”还是“以农立国”。此次争论包括了耳熟能详的一些经济学家、哲 学家、政治家等社会名流,以章士钊为代表的“守旧派”、梁漱溟、晏阳初等乡 村建设运动者为代表的“改良派”和以董时进为代表的“创新派”坚持“以农 立国”,他们的出发点是中国对于农国地位以及农国精神的维护;吴景超、张培 刚、孙倬章则是“以工立国”派的重要拥据,他们主要着眼于现实,提出只有建 立强大的工业基础才能挽救民族于危亡之中。此外“非名流”乃至“草根”阶级 也参与到了论战中,与他们相比,“名流”论战者有着更为宏观、全局性和深层 次的把握。传统认为“工农之争”的论战以“以工立国”派的胜利而告终,然而 从不同的视角看,“以农立国”的观点不无道理,甚至对于现阶段经济的发展 仍有指导意义。 关键词: 民国;以农立国;以工立国; 作者简介:禹思恬(1991-),女,北京大学经济学院博士研究生,主要研究方 向为中国经济思想史。 收稿日期:2017-05-07 基金:国家社会科学基金重点项目(16A儿003) Build A New Country on Industry or Agriculture? Recognition of Debate Over Country-building Foundation in the Period of Republic of China YU Sitian ZHOU Jianbo LIANG Yinhe School of Economics, Peking University; Abstract: In 1920 sand 1930 s, China had a dcbatc over the foundeition of building a new country. Whether to build a new country based on industry or agriculture was the core of the debate. On the one hand, celebrities including economists, philosophers and politicians joined in this debate. Zhang Shizhao was the representative of “the old guardsv ;Liang Shum ing and Yan Yangchu represe nted “the reformis ts” and Dong Shi jin was the representative of “the innovators^ . All of these three parties insisted on developing economy based on agriculture to maintain the essen tial position of agriculture. However, Wu Jingchao, Zhang Pei gang and Sun Zhuozhang represented the celebri ties who supported industry, considering the fact that only by developing industry would China be independent. On the other hand, the public also joined in this debate. Compared with the public, the view of celebrities was more comprehensive and profound. Traditionally we believe that the people who supported industry won the debate. However, from other respects, the view that to build China into a new country should be based on agriculture was also meaningful, which even can serve as guidance for current dcvclopmcnt of economy. Keyword: the period of the Republic of

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

ggkkppp + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档