- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
CAG Position Statement:
Hip fracture and proton pump inhibitor therapy – a 2013 update
CAG的立场声明:
髋部骨折和质子泵抑制剂治疗- 2013年更新
Health Canada have recently provided an information update on proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy and risk of fracture in April 2013 (1) stating “Several scientific studies suggest that PPI therapy may be associated with a small increased risk for fractures of the hip, wrist, or spine related to osteoporosis, adisease resulting in the weakening of bones. The risk of fracture was higher in patients who received multiple daily doses of PPIs and therapy for a year or longer. Additional risk factors for osteoporosis,such as age, gender and the presence of other health conditions, may also contribute to the increased risk of fractures. At Health Canada’s request, manufacturers of all PPIs marketed in Canada have updated the drug labels for their products to include information on this risk.”
加拿大卫生部最近提供了一个质子泵抑制剂(PPI)治疗的信息更新,在2013年4月的骨折风险(1)说明“一些科学研究表明,PPI治疗可能是一个小的风险增加髋部、腕部骨折,或脊柱相关疾病的骨质疏松症,导致骨骼弱化。骨折风险较高的患者接受PPI治疗多每天服用一年或更长时间。骨质疏松症的其他危险因素,如年龄,性别和其他健康状况的存在,也有助于增加骨折的风险。在加拿大卫生部的要求,所有在加拿大销售的厂家有PPIs更新他们的产品包括信息风险的药物标签。”
The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology provided a position statement on PPI therapy and risk ofhip fracture in 2008 (2) and we have updated this in light of the recent Health Canada statement. Large administrative databases are a useful tool to assess possible benefit or harms of health care interventions but given that billions of associations can be measured with these databases then highly statistically significant findings will inevitably occur by chance. Added to this problem is that any association may simply be due to confounding factors and not due to the health care intervention causing the disease (e.g. a database study may find that steroid inhaler therapy increases the risk of lung cancer but this may simply due to smokers are more likely to have lung disease (and be given steroid inhalers) and smoking causes lung cancer)
文档评论(0)