傅青主手批杜诗考辨-图书馆杂志.PDF

熊言安：《傅青主手批杜诗》考辨 Xiong Yan’an: Research on Fu Qingzhu’s Annotation on Poetry of Du Fu   97 《傅青主手批杜诗》考辨* 熊言安（安庆师范大学文学院） 摘  要  上海图书馆藏《傅青主手批杜诗》题跋应系翁同龢真迹，翁氏“谛审知为青主先生评 点”的鉴定结论不能轻易否定。《杜集书录》的质疑证据不足，而《杜集叙录》疑翁跋中“戊 子”为“戊戌”之误，亦值得商榷。傅山对杜甫《偶题》等三首诗真伪的质疑有助于推动杜诗辨 伪学研究。傅山对杜诗艺术和杜甫性格的批评反映了其对宋代以来崇杜之风的反省精神和不愿奉 清朝正朔的遗民心态。傅山评诗以“味”为中心，为清代流行的神韵说和性灵说开启了先声，具 有重要的诗学史价值。 关键词  翁同龢 傅山 真伪 批杜 遗民心态 DOI: 10.13663/ki.lj.2016.04.017 Research on Fu Qingzhu’s Annotation on Poetry of Du Fu Xiong Yan’an(College of Chinese Language and Literature, Anqing Normal University) Abstract In this study, we showed the authenticity of Weng Tonghe’s inscriptions on Fu Shan’s Annotation on Poetry of Du Fu , stored in Shanghai Library. Based on this, we proposed that Weng Tonghe’s assertion, the annotation is authored by Fu Shan, should not be easily denied. Then we showed that Books on Poetry of Du Fu’s questioning does not have sufficient evidences. We also disconfirmed the opinion from Descriptive Catalog of Poetry of Du Fu, “Wuzi” in Weng Tonghe’s inscription should be “Wuxu”. In addition, we showed that Fu Shan’s questioning on the authenticity of “Outi” and other two poems in Poetry of Du Fu assisted on discrimination of Du’s poems. And from Fu Shan’s criticism on the art of Du’s poems and the Du Fu’s disposition, we exposed Fu Shan’s introspection on the trend of admiring Du Fu from the Song Dynasty and Fu Shan’s adherents’ psychology denying Qing government’s legitimacy. In the end, we showed that Fu Shan’s evaluation of poems is focused on “flavor”, which is the harbinger of Theory of Verve and Theory of Disposition prevailing in the Qing Dynasty, important in the history of poetics. Key words Weng Tonghe, Fu Shan, Authenticity, Annotation on Du Fu’s poetry, Adherents’ psychology 上海图书馆藏《傅青主手批杜诗》系傅山 诗学有一定的文献价值。然学界尚有人怀疑翁 据明胡震亨撰、清朱茂时顺治七年刊《