关于思科诉华为的案例分析-法律·专利法专业论文.docxVIP

关于思科诉华为的案例分析-法律·专利法专业论文.docx

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
兰州大学颐士学位论文 兰州大学颐士学位论文 关于思科诉华为的案例分析 Abstract 触a“keystone case in IT history”,the case Cisco VS.Huawei still exerts its influence although it has been seven years since the closure of the case in America. Nowadays,corporations worldwide use the patent as a weapon tO fight in the fierce competition arena,therefore,it cannot be more important tO analyze again the strategy that patent has been used by Cisco in this case against Huawei. Through legal analysis,this thesis concentrates on Ciseo’S patent policy of its private protocols as well as the approaches it used to impede market entry of other competitors and therefore hamper competition in the market.On one hand,as one kind of the technical standards,private protocols per se are extremely exclusive and therefore,once they have been applied together with patents,they could be more vital and under such a situation,the patent could be abused by its owner.On the other hand, the integration of patents and technical standards can further strengthen the obligee’S monopoly in the market and consequently,exclude competition. The body of this dissertation combines three parts.The first part focuses on the background information of the case.After careful reading of the litigation put forward by the plaintiff,the author divided the statement of complaint into three categories and this paper will concentrate on litigation concerning patents.The analysis therefore sets forth some important notions such as private protocols and industry standards, and by making contrast and comparison of those notions,the author concludes that Huawei just used Cisco’S private protocols in a limited way and it cannot be sorted as tort,and raises the possibility that Cisco might have conducted patent abuses. The second part demonstrates that the conduct of Cisco is a patent abuse in technical standards.By analyzing the potential threat resulted from the integrat

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

131****9843 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档