- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Coke and Pepsi Learn to Compete in India By Diana Berger, Arthur Catlin, Ian Cavanaugh, Larry Cenotto, Dave Christiansen, and Matt Ross Background of Beverage Industry in India Coca-Cola’s past in India Present from 1958 until 1977 Industry Shakeup in 1988 State of the Industry in 1993 45% of market consisted of small manufacturers $3.2 million market share Low Demand for Carbonated Drinks Average of 3 servings a year/person in 1989 Average of 1404 servings a year/person in U.S. in 2003 Political Environment in India Political Environment in India Key Issues India seen as unfriendly to foreign investors for many years The “Principle of Indigenous Availability” Policy banning imports being sold in India The Liberalization of India’s Government in 1991 “New Industrial Policy” Trade rules regulations simplified Foreign investment increased Pepsi enters in 1986 Coca-Cola follows in 1993 Political Environment in India Indian Laws Unlawful to market under their Western name in India Pepsi became “Lehar Pepsi” Coca-Cola merged with Parle and became “Coca-Cola India” Different Laws for Pepsi and Coke Coca-Cola agreed to sell off 49% of its stock as a condition of entering and buying out an Indian company Pepsi entered earlier, and was not subject to this Political Environment in India Problems India forced Coke to sell 49% of its equity to Indian investors in 2002 Coke asked for a second extension that would delay it until 2007 India denied this Pepsi was held to this since they entered India in a different year. Coke asked the Foreign Investment Promotion Board to block the votes of the Indian shareholders who would control 49% of Coke Change in oversight of the FIPB Past lobbying efforts made useless Political Environment in India Could these problems have been forecasted prior to market entry? Probably not Inconsistent, and changing government How could these developments in the political arena have been handled differently? Coke could of agreed to start new bo
文档评论(0)