浅析不当得利制度.docVIP

摘 要 1 摘 要 不当得利制度一直以来都为人所诟病，究其原因，和不当得利构成要件上的不足有很大关系。目前的构成要件过于宽泛，在理念上是为了追求一种公平的目的。然而，时代变迁，不当得利在应用上逐渐被赋予了新的内涵，因此只以公平为原则为指导会使不当得利在应用的定位上处于一种模糊的状态，立法上对不当得利制度宽泛的规定导致了适用条件的模糊，所以才会经常出现与侵权行为和违约行为的竞合，使其处在一种“退而求其次”的情况下，导致在该制度的适用上出现滥用或者不敢适用，而目前的司法人员水平又难以驾驭不当得利制度。对此我认为应该修正不当得利构成要件使其更具有针对性，体现不当得利制度自身的价值，以避免不得地利现在在民法体系中尴尬的地位。 关键字：不当得利 制度理念 构成要件 立法缺陷 完善建议 ABSTRACT 2 ABSTRACT Unjust Enrichment system has been criticized, the reason is that the unjust enrichment Elements has a lot deficiency. In current the Elements was too broad and the idea is to pursue a fair goal has out of the date. However, times changed, the application of unjust enrichment has gradually been given a new meaning, only guided by the principle of fairness in the application of unjust enrichment would positioning the system in a vague state , legislation on the unjust enrichment system led to the applicable conditions to the fuzzy. It will often appear with the violations and default of competition and makes it in a second best situation, resulting in the application of the system appears abuse or not applicable, and the current level of judicial officers is difficult to master the unjust enrichment system. I think unjust enrichment should be amended to make it more specific and reflecting the value system itself to avoid the system now in the awkward position of civil law. Key words: Unjust Enrichment; system conception; elements of Unjust Enrichment; legislative deficiency; suggestion for improvement 目 录 1 目 录 TOC \o 1-2 \h \z \u HYPERLINK \l _Toc293406836 一、不当得利制度概述 1 HYPERLINK \l _Toc293406837 （一）不当得利制度历史沿革 1 HYPERLINK \l _Toc293406838 （二）不当得利的概念 2 HYPERLINK \l _Toc293406839 （三）不当得利性质 2 HYPERLINK \l _Toc293406840 （四）在民法体系中的地位 2 HYPERLINK \l _Toc293406841 二、不当得利构成要件 2 HYPERLINK \l _Toc293406842 （一）不当得利构成要件概说 2 HYPERLINK \l _Toc293406843 （二）各构成要件评析 3 HYPERLINK \l _Toc293406844 （三）构成要件上的不足 5 HYPERLINK \l _Toc293406845 三、我国不当得利制度的完善 5 HYPERLINK \l _Toc293406846 （一）许霆案引发的思考 5 HYPERLINK \l _Toc29340