案例-Netflix企业文化：自由与责任.pptVIP

* Independent Silos（国企型） Each group executes on their objectives with little coordination 每个团执行各自的目标，基本没有协同。 Everyone does their own thing 每个团队做自己的事。 Work that requires coordination suffers 要求协同的工作让各方都很受伤。 Alienation and suspicion between departments 部门之间山头林立，彼此排挤，相互怀疑。 Only works well when areas are independent只有完全独立的业务领域内才能运转顺畅。 e.g., aircraft engines and blenders for GE 例子：GE公司的飞机引擎制造部门和搅拌机制造部门 * #3 is the Netflix Choice第三种是Netflix的选择 1. Tightly Coupled Monolith 巨无霸型 2. Independent Silos 国企型 3. Highly Aligned, Loosely Coupled 认同一致又松耦合型 * Mostly, though, Rapid Recovery is the Right Model（大多数情况下，快速修正都是正确的模式） Just fix problems quickly 尽快修复问题 High performers make very few errors 高效能员工很少犯错 We’re in a creative-inventive market, not a safety-critical market like medicine or nuclear power 我们处在一个创新的市场，而不是一个类似医药或者核能这样以安全性为第一的市场 You may have heard preventing error is cheaper than fixing it 你也许听说过预防错误比修复代价更低 Yes, in manufacturing or medicine, but… 是的，在制造业或者制药业的确如此，但 Not so in creative environments 在创新型行业里并非如此。 * “Good” versus “Bad” Process好流程VS.坏流程 “Good” process helps talented people get more done 好流程帮助人才搞定更多事情 Letting others know when you are updating code 当你在升级代码时让其他人知道 Spend within budget each quarter so don’t have to coordinate every spending decision across departments 在每个季度都按照预算花钱，这样就不用频繁通过部门会议调整每一笔支出 Regularly scheduled strategy and context meetings 定期制定战略和搞清会议背景 * “Good” versus “Bad” Process好流程VS.坏流程 “Bad” process tries to prevent recoverable mistakes 坏流程试图阻止可以恢复的错误 Get pre-approvals for $5k spending 得到预先批准的5000美金支出额度 3 people to sign off on banner ad creative 要3个人签字才能终止的横幅广告创意 Permission needed to hang a poster on a wall 在墙上贴个海报需要的许可 Multi-level approval process for projects 项目所需的多层级许可流程 Get 10 people to interview each candidate 找10个人去面试每一个应聘者 * Rule Creep规则潜行 “Bad” processes tend to creep in 坏流程倾向于潜入 Preventing errors just sounds so good