清华大学考研辅导强化班英语阅读理.docVIP

清华大学考研辅导强化班课程 《英语阅读理解》 清华大学外语学院 吴霞 主讲 Part I 英语阅读考试简介 1．《大纲》要求 2．形式 5篇文章，各500字左右，后附4小题， 共20小题，40分 　 Part II 文章体裁 1．结论说明型 Passage 1 Science has long had an uneasy relationship with other aspects of culture. Think of Galileo’s 17th-century trial for his rebelling belief before the Catholic Church or poet William Blakes harsh remarks against the mechanistic worldview of Isaac Newton. The schism between science and the humanities has, if anything, deepened in this century. Until recently, the scientific community was so powerful that it could afford to ignore its critics-but no longer. As funding for science has declined, scientists have attacked anti-science in several books, notably higher superstition, by Paul R. Gross, a biologist at the University of Virginia, and Norman Leavitt, a mathematician at Rutgers University; and Defenders of science have also voiced their concerns at meeting such as The Flight from Science and Reason, held in New York City in 1995, and Science in the Age of (Mis) information, which assembled last June near buffalo. Anti-science clearly means different things to different people. Gross and Leavitt find fault primarily with sociologists, philosophers and other academics who have questioned sciences objectivity. Sagan is more concerned with those who believe in ghosts, creationism and other phenomena that contradict the scientific worldview. A survey of news stories in 1996 reveals that the anti-science tag has been attached to many other groups as well, from authorities who advocated the elimination of the last remaining stocks of smallpox virus to Republicans who advocated decreased funding for basic research. Few would dispute that the term applies to the Unabomber, whose manifesto, published in 1995, scorns science and longs for return to a pre-technological utopia. But surely that does not mean environmentalists concerned about uncontrolled industrial growth are anti-science, as an essay in US News World Report last May seemed to sugg