民事诉讼当事人陈述否定之否定-法学·诉讼法学专业毕业论文.docxVIP

摘要当事人陈述在我国民事诉讼立法中被规定为七种独立的证据之 摘要 当事人陈述在我国民事诉讼立法中被规定为七种独立的证据之 一，随着科学技术的进步，民事诉讼相关理论的发展变化，当事人陈 述的独立证据地位遭到“挑战。立法对当事人陈述的证据地位的确 立，并不表明其当然具有成为独立证据的“资格，当事人陈述的独 立证据地位是在特定的历史条件下形成的，当事人陈述自身的属性和 特点决定了当事人陈述并不具备作为独立证据的条件。笔者在对当事 人独立证据地位提出质疑的同时，基于当事人陈述的程序功能，对当 事人陈述的制度化提出了若干建议。 首先，从证据制度历史发展的角度对当事人陈述的独立证据价值 进行否定，随着科学技术的发展，证明方法从神证、人证到物证的演 变，当事人陈述的证据价值逐步隐退。第二，从民事诉讼相关理论发 展的角度进行论述。从自由主义的诉讼观到社会本位诉讼观的确立， 职权主义诉讼模式为当事入主义所取代，辩论主义与当事人处分原则 在民事诉讼中的贯彻，当事人陈述作为独立证据地位的不适应性日益 凸显。另外，对当事人陈述的固有特性进行分析，以及对当事人陈述 的内容进行分解，进一步动摇了当事人陈述的独立证据地位。 在对当事入陈述的证据价值进行否定的基础之上，强调当事人陈 述在新的时代背景下所具有的程序功能，以及针对我国当事人陈述的 非制度化现状，对当事人陈述提出制度化设想。 关键词民事诉讼，证据，当事人陈述，证据价值 AB AB STRACT In our country,the party’s statement is one of seven kind Of independent evidence in the civil procedure legislation．Along with the development of science and technology,and the changes of theories in the civil procedure，the independent evidence status of the party’s statement encounters“challenge’．Moreover,the evidence status establishment which stated in the legislation does not indicate that it certainly has the independent evidence qualifications．The independent evidence status of the party’S statement formed under the specific historical condition，but the party’S statement’S own attribute and characteristic had decided that it didn’t have take the independent evidence condition． The author deny the independent evidence status of the party’s statement．Firstly,the author deny its independent evidence status from the historical development of evidence system．Along with the development of science and technology,the method of evidence iS evolving form God profs、Human profs to Matter witness．At the same time，itS independent evidence status iS vanishing．Secondly,the author deny the independent evidence status of the party’S statement from the side of theories of the civil procedure．Along with the establishment of the Social Lawsuit view,the fundamental pattern of civil procedure developing from adversary system to authority system，and the implementation of