论缔约过失责任研究-民商法专业论文.docxVIP

论缔约过失责任 论缔约过失责任 摘要 ～、f各国均没有体系化的缔约过失责任制度，特别是大陆法系国家， 缔约过失责任制度不能融入传统的民事责任体系，导致合同责任与侵 权责任界限模糊。这与已有缔约过失责任理论的混乱是分不开的：缔 约过失责任理论基础没有把价值取向和民事责任性质两个问题划分 清楚，对民事责任性质意见分歧很大，在价值取向方面，甚至出现了 明显的认识错误；在构成要件上，机械套用一般民事责任的四大构成 合同法律关系，解决缔约过失责任制度的基础问题；其次，认为缔约 过失责任制度的立法原则是契约自由原则与诚实信用原则的平衡；第 三，明确缔约过失责任是一种独立的合同责任；第四，理清缔约过失 责任与一般民事责任构成要件的关系，提出二要件说；第五，抛弃“信 赖利益”这个在理论上引起混乱的概念，以固有财产利益作为缔约过 失责任损害赔偿的标准和范围；最后，根据本文的理论对我国现有的 缔约过失责任制度提出修正。 关键词：契约自由诚实信用利益平衡先善淤律关系缔约过 ／ 失固有财产利益 ON ON LIABILITY OF CULPA lN CONTRAHENDO ABSTRACT No country in the world has any systematic legal system of liability of culpa in contrahendo．Especially in common law legal system，liability of culpa in contrahendo call’t incorporate into the traditional civil liability system，which results in a confusion ofthe distinction between contract liability and tortious liability．This iS greatly related to the chaos ofcurrent theory on liability ofculpa in contrahendo：This theory didn’t distinguish its value orientation from its nature of civil liability．There exist greatly different viewpoints of its nature of civil liability and evident misunderstanding about its value orientation；the four constitutive elements ofgeneral civil liability,the ambiguous‘‘reliance interest”as the criteria of compensation for damages continue to be used．Based on the analysis of the above errors of current theory,this thesis makes efforts to reconstruct the system of liability of eulpa in eontrahendo．Firstly,pre—contract legal relationship is fully demonstrated SO as to make clear the foundation of this system；secondly,the legislative principle of this system is to balance between the principle of contract freedom and the principle of good faith；thirdly,liability of culpa in contrahendo is a kind of independent contract liability；fourthly,two factors must serve as the constitutive elements of this system which is quite different from those of general civil liability；fifthly,‘‘inherent property interest’’should be regarded aS the criteria and scope of