论刑事审判中社会学解释的限度-法律学专业论文.docxVIP

I I 论刑事审判中的社会学解释的限度 内容摘要 论刑事审判中社会学解释的限度 内容摘要 社会学解释是将社会学方法运用于法律解释之中，着重于社会效果预测和目的衡 量，在法律条文可能文义范围内阐释法律规范意义和内容的一种法律解释方法。社会 学解释方法具有补足法律适用、保障个案正义和制约法律解释权等独特功能。在刑事 审判过程能否运用社会学解释方法，目前学界认识不一，立法上存在缺位，但是在审 判实践中现实存在。通过考察当前刑事审判中社会学解释的应用现状，发现存在着偏 离罪刑法定原则倾向、对民意和舆论盲从、以主观臆断代替对社会共同观念的考量等 问题。由于社会学解释方法自身的局限性、罪刑法定原则的要求、对司法裁量权的必 要规制、刑法谦抑性的要求和对人权的必要保障，需要明确社会学解释在刑事审判中 应用的限度。为了更好地发挥社会学解释方法在刑事审判中的作用，应当遵循自律原 则和可预测原则，满足应用前提条件，注意社会效果的客观性和普遍性，建立起案例 指导制度并加强裁判说理。 关键词：刑事审判；法律解释；社会学解释；限度 作 者： 王 璐 指导老师：上官丕亮 II II Abstract On Sociological Interpretation Limits in Criminal Trial On Sociological Interpretation Limits in Criminal Trial Abstract Sociological interpretation is a method of law interpretation, focusing on the social effect prediction and objective measure, in the legal provisions may explain a literal interpretation of the law within the scope of legal norms of significance and content. Sociological interpretation has unique features. It can make up the applicable law, safeguard the case justice and restrict the power of law interpretation. In the process of criminal trial can uses sociological methods, at present academia is not a recognized, the absence of legislation, but there are practical in trial practice. Through the investigation of the using sociological interpretation in criminal justice in the current society, found that there is a problem from the legal principle of crime and punishment tendency, blindly on public opinion and to the subjective instead of social common concept concerns. The sociological interpretation method limitation, requirements of the principle of legality, the judicial discretion necessary regulation, modesty of criminal law and the requirements of the human rights guarantee, need to clear the sociological interpretation of use in criminal trial limit. In order to better play the role of social science method of interpretation in criminal trials, should follow the principle of autonomy and predictable principles, applicable conditions, note the objectivity