我国反垄断法上协同行为的认定.pdfVIP

我国反垄断法上协同行为的认定 中文摘要 中文摘要 13 我国 《反垄断法》中第 条中规定了 “协同行为”，但是相关的实施规则中 的相关规定略显单薄，在这样的背景下，本文在讨论协同行为基本理论的基础上， 通过概括我国协同行为的现状，发现我国协同行为在实施中存在立法不完善、协 同合意难以证明，以及经营者合理理由抗辩等问题。针对这些问题，在探寻了美、 欧、俄等反垄断法发展相对完善的国家的相关规定及实践，并结合我国的实际情 况后，本文认为应该细化认定协同行为的相关规定，完善协同行为相关的民事、 行政甚至刑事责任；改进反垄断执法机构的行政执法权限；注意观察平行行为、 调查辅助行为，恰当运用各类间接证据，并结合举证责任倒置及推定制度，组合 多种方法证明协同行为的存在。 关键词：协同行为 反垄断法 认定 作 者：吴思思 指导老师：曹 博 I 英文摘要 我国反垄断法上协同行为的认定 The identification of cooperativebehavior in Chineseanti-monopoly law Abstract There is ‘Cooperativebehavior’inthe anti-monopoly law of our country,but the relevant provisions of the implementation are a bit weak. The article generalizes the current situationof cooperativebehavior, and summarizesthe issues.It arguesthatthe legislation of the cooperative behavior is imperfect, the collaborative consensus is difficult to prove, and the operators defend with reasonable grounds. To solve these problems, the article searches for relevant experience of other countries, such as the United States,Europe andRussia allofwhom have thewell-developed anti-monopoly laws inpractice. This article arguesthat China shouldrefine the relevant requirements forcooperationbehavior andimprovetherelatedResponsibilityincivil,administrative and even criminal cases. It also argues that China must improve the administrative enforcement permissions of antitrust law enforcement agencies. In order to improve enforcement, China must observe the similar behaviors, investigate the assisted behavior,use avariety ofindirectevidenceproperly, andcombinethiswiththeburden of proof inversion and presumptio