- 1、本文档共40页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
風險管理學報 第四卷 第二期 2002 年 11 月
Journal of Risk Management Vol.4 No.2 Nov. 2002
pp. 1-29
The Role of Institutional Ownership and Herding in Diversification Strategy
機構持股、從眾與風險分散
*
Chih-Hsien Yu (游智賢)
Abstract
This paper aims at exploring the relative importance of institutional ownership and behavior of herding in the effect of diversification. I
first examine the degree of significance on herding for stocks with different levels of institutional ownership. Many previous studies based on
the US market argue that institutional investors may exhibit more herding behavior than the individual investors since there are more incentives
for the institutional investors than for the individual investors to herd in their trading. Indeed, I find that stocks with higher (lower) mutual
fund ownership tend to exert higher (lower) degree of herding. But the extent of herding is not as strong for the securities dealers. This
implies that mutual fund managers exhibit more herding than securities dealers do. Next, I attempt to assess the diversification benefits for
the portfolios with different levels of institutional ownership or different extent of herding. The evidence shows that the return association is
higher (and consequently, the diversification benefit is lower) among stocks with larger institutional ownership th
文档评论(0)