ORC发电机组的高层次评估与比较.pdf

KTH ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ON HIGH LEVEL EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF ORC POWER GENERATORS ASME ORC 2015, Brussels Paper ID: 25 Henrik Öhman, Per Lundqvist Content 1. Lack of proper terms of merit 2. Utilization: A scale for performance comparison 3. Integrated Local Carnot Efficiency: A reversible reference 4. Fraction of Carnot vs. Utilization: Proposal 5. Normative References: How can we use them? Inadequate terms of merit? • Room for ”over-optimistic” or ”under-ethical” market players • Unrealistic customer expectations • Investors find ”plenty of reasons to wait” • Customers ”do not understand”  Entry barriers to the market No matter if technology is mature if communication is immature! Criteria for useful terms of merit • Cannot violate theory • Explainable and acceptable to practitioners • Free of bias from relevant boundary variations • Show ”primary good” in a dimensionless manner Conventional terms of merit for ORC power generators  1T T Carnot efficiency c 2 1 Irrelevant Thermal efficiency   Biased th W Q1 Exergy efficiency     Ambiguous  W m  e e ex 1 1,entry 1,exit        Exergy efficiency  W m  e e m  e e Iteration ex 1 1,entry 1,exit 2