康艾注射液联合化疗治疗晚期胃癌的临床研究.docVIP

康艾注射液联合化疗治疗晚期胃癌的临床研究.doc

  1. 1、本文档共6页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
康艾注射液联合化疗治疗晚期胃癌的临床研究 吴莉,杨怡 (贵州省人民医院肿瘤科,贵阳550002) 提要:目的 探讨康艾注射液联合化疗在治疗晚期胃癌中的作用。方法 将80例晚期胃癌患随机分为治疗组(化疗加康艾注射液组)和对照组(单纯化疗组)。观察比较两组细胞免疫功能的变化、近期疗效、生活质量改善和毒副反应。结果 治疗组治疗后NK细胞活性,CD4/CD8比值明显高于治疗前,差异有显著性(P0.01),CD3、CD4值升高,差异有显著性(P0.05)。对照组治疗后NK细胞活性、CD3、CD4、CD4/CD8值均较治疗前低,差异有显著性(P0.05)。治疗组与对照组近期疗效有效率分别为45.5%和40.0%,差异无显著性(P0.05)。治疗组在白细胞减少、恶心呕吐、周围神经毒性发生率方面均明显低于对照组,差异有显著性(P0.05)。治疗组在乏力减轻、食欲增加、kamfsky增加高于对照组,差异有显著性(P0.01)。在疼痛减轻、体重增加方面治疗组也高于对照组,差异有显著性(P0.05)。结论:康艾注射液联合化疗治疗晚期胃癌可降低化疗对患者细胞免疫功能的影响及不良反应,改善患者的生活质量。 关键词:胃癌 化疗 康艾注射液 A Clinical Stuy of Treating Advanced Gastric Cancer with the Combination of Kang-ai Injection and Chemotherapy. Wu Li, Yang Yi (Department of Oncology, Guiyang Provinical People’s Hospital, Guyang 550004) Abstract: Objective: to explore the effect of treating advanced gastric cancer with the combination of Kang-ai Injection and chemotherapy. Methods: 80 patients with advanced gastric cancer were randomly divided into treatment group (chemotherapy + Kang-ai Injection) and control group ( chemotherapy only). Observation was conducted on cellular immunization, short-term effect, life quality improvement, and toxic side-effect in both groups. Results: in the treatment group, both NK cellular activity and CD4/CD8 ratio were higher after the treatment and the difference was significant (p0.01); CD3 and CD4 were both increased and the difference was significant (p0.05). In the control group, the NK cellular activity, CD3, CD4, CD4/CD8 ratio were all lower after the treatment and the difference was significant (p0.05). The short-term efficacy rate was 45% in the treatment group and 40% in the control group. The difference was not significant. The treatment group was apprarently lower than the control group in leukopenia, nausea and/vormitting, and peripheral nerve toxicity (p0.05). Compared with the control group, less fatigue, better appetite, and kamotsky increase were observed in the treatment group, and the difference was signficant (p0.01). The treatment g

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

xiaowei110 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档