UST-Structural-Design-Review-地下储罐结构设计概述.pptxVIP

UST Structural Design Review地下储罐结构设计概述A buyer of underground storage tanks (USTs) may look at the question of structural integrity when choosing between a Xerxes fiberglass reinforced plastic (FRP) tank and a steel tank.在赛西斯FRP储罐和钢罐之间选择时，采购者一般会考虑储罐结构完整性这个问题。Structural failures are infrequent and generally result from poor installation.储罐结构失效非常罕见，而且一般是由不恰当的安装方式导致的Corrosion remains the number 1 cause of UST failure.地下储罐损坏的首要成因是腐蚀引起的 Simply comparing materialsfrom which USTs are constructed —fiberglass or steel — does not lead to a valid or useful conclusionabout structural competency单纯的从储罐制作材料（FRP材料或者钢）上进行对比，很难得到关于储罐结构性能好坏的有效结论。In addition to materials of construction,other significant factors in structural integrity are:除了需要考虑制作材料外，还需要考虑其他一些重要因素，例如： tank design, backfill selection.储罐设计回填材料的选择When each of these factors materials of construction, tank design, backfill selection,are considered, we can conclude that:In good installations with good backfill,a Xerxes tank is stronger than a steel tank.In poor installations with marginal backfill,a Xerxes tank is stronger than a steel tank. 当所有的相关因素都进行了考虑评估后，包括：制作材料、储罐设计、回填材料的选择，我们就容易知道：在良好的安装质量和良好的回填材料的情况下，赛西斯储罐要优于钢罐。在安装质量不够好，回填材料能达标的情况下，赛西斯储罐也要优于钢罐。All USTs fiberglass and steel are designed as flexible, thin-walled structures.所有的地下储罐，包含FRP材质和钢制的，其设计都是带有一定变形量的，薄壁结构FRPSteelThe 3 major failure modes evaluated by the structural designer are: crushing, buckling — overall and local, excessive deflection.结构设计人员评估3种失效模式是：压破屈曲---整体或者局部 挠度过大Crushing:The compressive stress required tocause a tank wall to fail by fracture.压破：要求压力会导致储罐壁破裂Global Buckling:Instantaneous bending of a sheet, plate or columnsupporting a compressive load; a point in the stresshistory where a bifurcation occurs.整体屈曲瞬间施加一个片状、碟状或者柱状的压缩负荷，之前受到过压力的点就会出现整体屈曲。Overall Buckled Tank整体发生屈曲的储罐Deflection: the movement of a structure or a structural part as a result of loads stressing the backfill and the structure.挠度挠度是指回填材料负荷导致的储罐整体结构或者部分结构上的位移变化BeforeAfterAll USTs are