论行政自由裁量权及其程序控制(1)概要.docVIP

论行政自由裁量权及其程序控制 孙爱华 (苏州农业职业技术学院思政教研室,江苏苏州215008 摘要:随着社会的发展,行政自由裁量权的合理、 适度行使对法治有重要的促进和保障作用,但是行政自由裁量权在现代国家权力中的扩张使其在运行中带来了一些负面效应,必须加以控制。行政程序为行政行为设置一种安全的运行模式,使得行政过程公开,公正,合理;并且通过相对人程序性参与,保持行政权力与相对人权利的平衡,限制行政行为的恣意、专断。为了发挥行政程序的有效作用,通过对我国行政程序立法现状的分析,研究得出行政程序立法必须摒弃“重实体,轻程序”的传统观念,树立“程序正义” 的立法理念,尽快制定一部统一的行政程序法。关键词:行政自由裁量权;控制;行政程序;程序法制化中图分类号:D912.1 文献标识码:A 文章编号:1009-2463(201006-0059-06 An Analysis of Administrative Discretion and its Procedure Control SUN Ai-hua (Suzhou Polytechnic Institute of Agriculture,Suzhou 215008,China Abstract:With the social development,reasonable and moderate exercise of administrative discretion plays an important role in promoting and safeguarding rules of law .However,the expansion of administrative discretion in the modern state power has brought some negative effects during its operation,which must be controlled. Administrative procedures set up a safe operation mode for administrative behavior to make its process open, fair and reasonable, and keep a balance of administrative power and counterpart rights and restrict the arbitrary of administrative behavior through counterpart ’s procedural involvement. In order to play the effective role of administrative procedures,based on the analysis of the current legislation of the administrative procedure,the paper comes to the conclusion that the administrative procedure legislation must abandon the traditional concept of “substantiality overweighing process ” ,establish the legislation idea of “procedural justice ”and formulate a unified administrative procedural lawas soon as possible. Key words:administrative discretion;control;administrative procedure;legalization of procedure 行政自由裁量权是现代行政发展的重要特征和趋势,但是自由裁量权也容易导致行政权力行使的主观性和任意性,造成行政权的滥用和失控。在新的形势下,宽泛的裁量授权造成对自由裁量仅仅依靠事先的立法控制和事后的司法审查已远远不够,必须设置一定的规则对行政权力 的行使进行规制,这一规则即行政程序,强调行政自由裁量权必须更多在它的行使过程中受到监督和规范。因此,以程序控制行政自由裁量权的滥用是现代法治国家的应有之义。 一、行政自由裁量权的存在 行政自由裁量权是现代行政法的一个基本 收稿日期:2010-06-07 作者简介:孙爱华(1979-,女,汉族,江苏启东人,苏州农业职业技术学院思政教研室讲师,硕士。 2010年11月安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版 Nov .,2