我国医疗纠纷第三方调解机制分析.pdfVIP

摘 要 摘 要 近年来，随着医疗水平的不断提高和人们医疗维权意识的增强，医疗纠纷也倍受社 会各界的关注，“医闹”事件的不断发生也越来越影响社会的稳定。当前，我国医疗纠 纷解决的方式主要有三种：医患双方和解协商、卫生行政调解以及诉讼方式。虽然这三 种方式在一定程度上解决了医疗纠纷问题，但均存在一定的不足之处。为了有效解决医 疗纠纷问题，各地纷纷寻求新的医疗纠纷解决机制，不管是学术界还是实务界均呼吁建 立第三方调解机制，希望通过这种新的解决方式来弥补医疗纠纷三种传统解决方式的不 足，为有效缓和医患矛盾提供新的途径。 当前，我国尚未在全国范围内建立统一的医疗纠纷第三方调解机制，在探究了各地 该制度的不同运行情况后，本文发现该机制的运行也存在一定的需要完善的地方。如， 在立法上医疗纠纷第三方调解组织的法律地位不明确，机构队伍建设上人员不专业，运 行上具体程序不规范，鉴定制度不完善等等。在发现我国该制度不完善的基础上，秉着 吸收借鉴的原则，考察了国外医疗纠纷第三方调解机制，期望能得到相关启示。最后本 文在立法上、机构设置上、程序上以及鉴定制度上提出了完善建议。对于医疗纠纷第三 方调解机制的研究有利于促进其日益成熟与完善,其必将成为解决医患纠纷更公正、公 平的新平台,也将更有利于化解医患双方之间的矛盾，维护社会的和谐稳定。 关键词 医疗纠纷 第三方调解机制 运作模式 人民调解委员会 I Abstract Abstract In recent years, with increasing levels of health care and peoples awareness of health care rights, medical malpractice has won much attention in social circles, in addition, the frequent occurrence of medical trouble event has increasingly affected social stability. At present, there are three main resolutions to medical dispute in China: the doctor-patient settlement negotiations, mediation and health administrative litigation on both sides. Although these three ways can solve medical malpractice to some extent , there are still some deficiencies. In order to solve the problem of medical disputes effectively, all regions have to seek new medical dispute resolution mechanisms one after another. Both academics and practitioners are calling for the establishment of third-party mediate on mechanism, hoping that it can compensate for the deficiency in three traditional ways of medical malpractice and providing a new way to ease the doctor-patient conflicts effectively thro