创造性思维评价办法的研究综述.pdfVIP

Advances in Psychology 心理学进展, 2019, 9(1), 165-170 Published Online January 2019 in Hans. /journal/ap /10.12677/ap.2019.91021 A Review on Evaluation Methods of Creative Thinking Zhuqing Jiang, Ling Liu, Zhan Xu Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing th th th Received: Jan. 4 , 2019; accepted: Jan. 17 , 2019; published: Jan. 24 , 2019 Abstract Creativity is the ability to produce novel, original, unusual and appropriate solutions to complex problems. It plays an important role in promoting scientific and technological progress, artistic creation and commercial development. Its core is creative thinking, which can be divided into di- vergent thinking and convergent thinking. This study starts from the four factors of creative di- vergent thinking proposed by Guilford (1967), sorts out the evaluation methods of divergent thinking, and summarizes them into objective and subjective, at the same time, analyzes the me- thods from the perspective of subjective and objective perspectives. Looking forward to the future research direction with their advantages and disadvantages respectively at the end. Keywords Creative Thinking, Divergent Thinking, Creative Evaluation 创造性思维评价方法的研究综述 姜竹卿，刘 玲，徐 展 西南大学心理学部，重庆 收稿日期：2019年1月4 日；录用日期：2019年1月17 日；发布日期：2019年1月24 日 摘 要 创造性是对复杂问题能够产生新颖的、独创的、不寻常的、适宜的解决方案的能力，对促进科技进步、 艺术创作及商业发展等起着重要作用，其核心是创造性思维，分为发散思维和聚合思维。本研究从 Guilford (1967)提出的创造性发散思维的四个指标出发，对发散思维的评价方式进行了梳理，归纳为客 文章引用: 姜竹卿, 刘玲, 徐展(2019). 创造性思维评价方法的研究综述. 心理学进展, 9(1), 165-170. DOI: 10.12677/ap.2019.91021 姜竹卿 等 观和主观两种评价方法，从主客观的角度进行了分析。最后，结合各自存在的优点和缺陷对未来研究进 行了展望。 关键词 创造性思维，发散思维，创造性评价 Copyright © 201