基于复杂性科学的系统思维与中医整体思维辨析.pdfVIP

32 2 2009 2 80 Journal of Be ij ing U n iversity ofT rad itiona l Chinese M ed ic ine V o.l 32 N o. 2 F eb. 2009 基于复杂性科学的系统思维与中医整体思维辨析* # ( 北京中医药大学 北京 100029) : 中医要现代化, 仅做到应用现代科学技术发展中医是不够的, 这不仅是医学科学层次问题, 还 是 一个哲学层次问题而这个问题的 决, 应当首先从哲学范畴从思维方式上寻找突破点本文 从思维方式角度出发, 梳理系统思维及中医整体思维涵盖下的形象思维及灵感思维, 并进一步阐述 系统思维与中医整体思维的差异认为以系统论为思维基本模式的系统思维, 将整体论和还原论 辩证统 一, 它不同于形象思维或灵感思维等本能思维形态系统思维可以弥补中医整体思维的不 足之处, 能够 决中医的复杂性问题这为变革中医思维方式, 发展中医提供了契机 : 系统思维; 中医; 整体思维 : R203 D iscrim ination between system atic thinking based on complexity science * and TCM holistic thinking # SONG L inli, MENG Q inggang ( Be ijing Un iversity of Ch inese M edicine, Be ijing 100029) Abstract: t is no t enough to apply m odern sc ience and techno logy in the developm ent of trad itional Chinese m edicine ( TCM ) for the m odernization ofTCM. T his is not on ly a m edicine science problem, bu t also a ph ilosophy problem. The breakthrough shou ld be searched from philosophical category and m enta lity to solve the prob lem. m agina l thinking and insp iration thinking w ere com bed here included in system at ic th ink ing and TCM ho listic think ing. The d ifference betw een system atic th ink ing and TCM holist ic th inking w as expounded w ith system ic theory as its basic mode, wh ich is the dialectica l un ity of reductionism and holism, and is different from inst inctive thinking m ode, such as mi agina l thinking or inspiration th ink ing. System atic think ing can replen ish TCM ho listic th ink ing and solve comp lexity questions, and offer the ch