突发事 件应对之战地救护.pptVIP

??? ????? ?????? ??: ???? ?????? ????, ???? ?????? ???? ??????? ???? ?????? ????? ??????? ?? ?????? ?? ????? ???? ??? ???? ??????? ???? ???? ?????? Which side? Trick question – there is no uterus or vena cava in the upper airway Movie with entry exit wounds ??? ?? ???????? ??????? ?? ?????? ??? ?? ?????? ????? Improvised First Aid Kit Improvised First Aid Kit ?? ???? ????. Note the modified Heimlich valve Transport of the casualty will often be the most problematic aspect of providing tactical combat casualty care. Although the civilian standard of care is to immobilize the spinal column prior to moving a patient with injuries that might have resulted in damage to the spine, this practice needs to be reevaluated in the combat setting. Arishita et al.4 examined the value of cervical spine immobilization in penetrating neck injuries in Vietnam and found that in only 1.4% of patients with penetrating neck injuries would immobilization of the cervical spine have been of possible benefit. The time required to accomplish cervical spine immobilization was found to be 5.5 minutes, even when using experienced emergency medical technicians. The authors therefore concluded the potential hazards to both patients and provider outweighed the potential benefit of immobilization. However, parachuting injuries, fast-roping injuries,5 falls greater than 15 feet, and other types of trauma resulting in neck pain or unconsciousness should be treated with spinal immobilization unless the danger of hostile fire constitutes a greater risk in the judgment of the medic. dragging the casualty by the web gear, ponchos, even a length of rope with a snap link can be used to drag a casualty out of the field of fire Transport of the casualty will often be the most problematic aspect of providing tactical combat casualty care. Although the civilian standard of care is to immobilize the spinal column prior to moving a patient with injuries that might have resulted in damage to the spine, this pract