认罪认罚从宽案件上诉权研究.pdf

认罪认罚从宽案件上诉权研究 中文摘要 2016 2018 10 26 认罪认罚从宽制度从 年开始经过两年试点后，于 年 月 日被 正式写入 《刑事诉讼法》，正式在全国全面施行。由于认罪认罚从宽制度目前还 18 处在探索阶段，本次 《刑事诉讼法》仅仅是修改增加 个条款以确立该项制度， 但是其它诉讼制度未相应作出修改以及未出台相配套的制度。在试点和施行期 间，司法实践中逐渐显露出一些问题，引起业界和学界的广泛关注。其中，就被 告人上诉问题，认罪认罚从宽案件在判决前，被告人已与司法办案人员就判决结 果达成一致意见，并且被告人也签署了具结书予以确认，但在判决后被告人又就 判决结果提起上诉，被告人此举既享受了认罪认罚量刑从宽的实惠，又对该项制 度实施所追求的提高诉讼效率、节约司法资源等目标造成冲击。本文通过采集 2019 年的样本上诉案例，提炼出被告人认罪认罚从宽后提起上诉的行为所存在 的问题、带来的影响，分析这一问题背后存在的法律不健全、价值冲突未解决的 原因，再通过对国内各种学术观点的评述、分析借鉴域外国家及地区的辩诉交易 制度和刑事协商制度下对被告人上诉问题的处理，结合我国实际国情，提出限制 认罪认罚从宽被告人上诉权的观点以及完善相关配套制度的浅见。 关键词：认罪认罚，被告人，上诉，限制 I A Study on the Right of Appeal in Pleading Guilty and Accepting Lenient Punishment Cases Abstract After two years of trial in 2016, the leniency system was officially written into the criminal procedure law on October 26, 2018, and went into effect nationwide.As the system of admitting guilt and accepting punishment for leniency is still in the exploratory stage, the criminal procedure law only amended and added 18 articles to establish the system, but other litigation systems have not been modified accordingly and no corresponding system has been introduced. During the period of trial and implementation, some problems gradually emerged in judicial practice, which attractedwide attention from the industry and academia.Greater appeal issues,among them, the defendant pleaded guilty to forfeit their case before the judgment, the defendant has an agreement on the outcome and the judicial investigators, and the defendant also signed the declaration confirm,but after the defendant in thejudgment and will appeal against the verdict, the defendant pleaded guilty to move not only enjoy