PaulGray智能交通世界大会ITS智慧城市社区人工智能AI物联网IT报告课件教案.pdfVIP

Congestion Beating Infrastructure Economic Cost of Congestion • Incremental economic cost of congestion is staggering • USA – $124B in 2013 – $186B in 2030 (+50%) – Cumulative cost of $2.8T! • France – $22.5B in 2013 – $29.6B in 2030 (+31%) – Cumulative cost of $469B • Sydney – $5.1B in 2015 – $8.8B in 2020 (+72%)! – 50% of cost from freight Long-Term: Autonomous Vehicles • Autonomous vehicles offer the best solution in the long term • Saves incremental costs of congestion – Reduced travel time – Reduced waiting time – Less stops (fuel savings) • Transforms direct costs of transportation – driving time = productive time – Potentially no freight drivers • Could increase lane capacity by 500% (RAND) • But need V2I infrastructure to fully realise this Mid-Term: V2X Production Vehicles • Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) applications reduce congestion – Green Wave – Speed Harmonization – Probe Vehicle Data – Road Worker Warnings • V2I estimated to (USDOT): – Save 33% of travel delay – Reduce freight delivery times 20% • V2V safety will help too – 25% of congestion events result from traffic accidents • Again, V2I infrastructure is needed Near-Term: Aftermarket FSP • Freight Signal Priority (FSP) gives freight vehicles priority at traffic signals • Equip freight corridors with V2I infrastructure • Equip freight vehicles with aftermarket V2X equipment • Immediate benefits (USDOT) – Improve travel times by 20% – Reduce stops (saves fuel) • Early stage deployment of V2I infrastructure Phased Deployment of Infrastructure Aftermarket FSP Production V2X Immediate