如何处理编辑和审稿人的意见.pdfVIP

How to deal with the Editors and Reviewers Peer Review Peer review is the evaluation of work by one or more people of similar competence to the producers of the work (peers). It constitutes a form of self-regulation by qualified members of a profession within the relevant field. (3~4) Peer review methods are employed to maintain standards of quality, improve performance, and provide credibility. (QC) In academia, scholar peer review is often used to determine an academic papers suitability for publication. Procedule 1.Editor border decision (reject or send out for review) 2.Review process 3. Editor consideration (reject or revise) How to deal with Editor’s decision and Reviewer’s comments? Consider What the Editors Decision Letter Really Says In nonaccept decision letters, editors usually send a message about how interested they are in seeing this work again . If the editor has decided to reject your paper, as the first example shows, it is best to just accept the decision and consider another journal . Some rejection letters offer an opportunity to resubmit. You still have your foot in the door, but you need to carefully consider whether there is a realistic chance that you can improve the paper to the reviewers satisfaction. The third example is also a revise-and-resubmit letter, but it tells you that the paper should be acceptable after you have satisfactorily responded to the reviewers comments. Even If the Reviewer Is Wrong, It Does Not Mean You Are Right Sometimes reviewers miss something and then ask about it in the comments. Sometimes the reviewer is not an expert on everything you presented in the paper and misjudges the importance of something that they ask