交通肇事中关于自首问题的认定.docVIP

交通肇事中关于自首问题的认定 摘 要：交通肇事罪是一种发案率较高的犯罪。理论和实践中，对于交通肇事罪“自首”的存在空间一直未有定论。近段时间，多起恶性交通事故频繁进入公众视野。交通肇事罪中的自首问题再次成为学者们关注和争论的焦点。交通肇事罪系过失犯罪，由于法律规定的特殊性和实际案件的复杂性，自首在交通肇事罪中的适用成为一个颇有争议的问题。本文通过对交通肇事罪中能否适用自首制度的论述，剖析了认为交通肇事罪中不能适用自首制度的看法存在的漏洞，并深挖了产生此种看法存在的矛盾和冲突的根源，认为虽然交通肇事罪在评价上存在特殊性，但并不影响刑法总则规定的自首制度在交通肇事罪中的适用，身为行政刑法的交通肇事罪，在刑法关于自首的认定中亦不应受行政法规的影响，具有相对的独立性。结合我国当前关于交通肇事罪的立法现状及司法实践，笔者从全新的角度提出自己的观点。 关键词：自首；交通肇事罪；逃逸 Abstract: Traffic accident is a high incidence of crime. In theory and practice, traffic accident has been no word on space to the surrendered. Nearly, dozens of malignant frequent accidents came into public view. The traffic accident surrendered problem become scholars’ concern and a major point of debate again. Traffic accident crime is involuntary crime, because of the particularity of legal provisions and the complexity of actual cases, the application of confession to justice in traffic accident crime becomes a controversial issue. Through the discussion on whether confession to justice system applies in traffic accident crime, the author analyzes the existing loopholes of the view that the confession to justice system doesn’t apply in traffic accident crime, and studies deeply the existing contradiction of this view and the source of confliction. What’s more, the author thinks that although there is particularity in the evaluation of traffic accident crime, which doesn’t affect the application of confession to justice system regulated by General Principles of Criminal Law in traffic accident crime. Traffic accident crime belongs to administrative criminal law, but it shouldn’t be affected by the provisions of administrative criminal law in the affirmation of confession to justice, and it is relevantly independent. Combining the legislation current and judicial practice of traffic accident crime in China, the author puts forward his view points from a brand new angle. Key Words: Confession to Justice; traffic Accident Crime; Escape 引言 交通肇事罪系我国刑法分则中的罪名，在我们平时的生活中也属于多发性犯罪。随着我国道路交