- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
复方乌骨藤汤联合化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床研究
张炳谦、闵天劳、伍千国
(杨凌高新医院,陕西杨凌712100)
【摘要】
目的 观察和评价复方乌骨藤汤联合化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效和毒副反应。方法 选择非小 细胞肺癌(热毒壅肺,痰瘀互结,气虚血瘀证)患者108例,分为复方乌骨藤汤联仑化疗组38例(治疗组)、 单纯化疗组36例(对照1组)及单纯复方乌骨藤汤组34例(对照2组),两组化疗均采用NP方案,完成 2个周期后进行疗效评价。
结果 治疗组有效率为73.7%,对照1组有效率为41.7%,对照2组有效率为47. 1%,治疗组分别同两对照 组比较皆有显箸性差异(卩0.05),两对照组比较无显著性差异(P0.05),治疗组在中医分型疗效分 析、体靈变化及生活质最等方面疗效均明显优于对照1组(P值均0.05),治疗组同对照2组均无显著 差异(P值均 0. 05):治疗组同对照2组NK细胞活性及CD1 / CD8比值治疗后明显髙于治疗前(P值均 0.01)。治疗组及对照2组毒副反应发生率明显低于对照1组(P值均 0. 05) o
结论复方乌骨藤汤联合化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(热毒壅肺,痰瘀互结,气虚血瘀证)有较好疗效,能 有效改善临床症状,提高免疫功能,能明显提高复方耳骨藤汤的治疗效果,并对化疗药物有明显的增效减 毒作用。
【关键词】 复方乌骨藤汤:化疗;晚期菲小细胞肺癌
The clinical study on therapeutic effects of prescription crow bone soup combined with chemotherapy to late non-small cells lung cancer
Zhang Bing-qian, Mian Tian-lao, Wu Qian-guo
(Yangling high-tech hospital, shaanxi yangling, 712100)
Abstract
Purpose: The clinical effect and side-effects of prescription crow bone soup combined with chemotherapy to late non-small cells lung cancer were observed and evaluated?
Method: 108 non-smal1 cells lung cancer case were selected? The prescription crow bone soup combined with chemotherapy group was 38 cases (treatment group)?The single chemotherapy group was 36 cases (control group 1)? The single prescription crow bone soup group was 36 cases (control group 2). Two chemotherapy groups were completed through NP ways and the effects were evaluated after two weeks?
Results: The curative ratio of treatment group was 73.7%. The curative ratio of control group
and control group 2 were 41. 7%. There was a significant difference between treatment group and two control groups (p0? 05), but two control groups had no significant difference (P0.05)? About the traditional Chinese physician non-single types analysis, body weight change and quality of life, the treatment group surpass the control group 1 (p0? 05), but there was no significant difference as compared with control group 2 (P0. 05)? The treatment group with the control group
NK cell activity a
原创力文档


文档评论(0)