- 1、本文档共8页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
How to Get the Poor off Our Conscience Group Members: Jane Liu Emily Ni Lucia Liu Elsie Qian Sunny Mao Mandy Meng Question: Describe the five contemporary designs of getting the poor off our conscience. How does the author challenge each of these arguments? The first design: (Para. 12) To take away the responsibility to aid the poor from the government and to put an end to the social welfare policies since the New Deal. The author’s argument is: Most of the assistance to the poor has to be undertaken by the government, but the government is in essence incompetent and ineffective and will make a mess of the job. Therefore, the government should not be asked to aid the poor. The second design: (Para. 14~15) Any form of public help to the poor will hurt the poor themselves. Such help will destroy poor people’s motivation, make them lazy and break up their marriages. This is another typical argument put forward today by the conservatives in the U.S. in the discussion of social welfare reform. The author thinks: The accusations are groundless. He further points out that those who support the design have no way to prove that the damage of the aid to the poor is greater than the damage to them caused by a loss of public assistance. The third design: (Para. 16) When you give public assistance to the poor, you take money away (through taxes) from the rich and give it ( in the form of public assistance) to the poor. The result is the rich become less willing to work hard and create wealth and the poor are encouraged to remain idle. Author’s argument: The author uses two rhetorical questions to counter the argument. He implies that it is not the case that most poor people would prefer welfare to paying job. As for corporate executives, they are working very hard, showing no sign of lack of incentive. To say they are being lazy becau
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- Unit 5 We’re family第2课时(课件)2024-2025学年度-外研版(三起)(2024)英语三年级上册.pptx VIP
- 教育教学设计:青少年科技辅导员论文(马伟)2016-3.doc VIP
- 塞斯纳172飞机起落架系统可靠性分析.docx
- 《WPS办公与应用》期末考试复习题库(含答案).docx
- DDS软件-AMADEUS5.doc
- 小学英语课程与教学论.pptx VIP
- 以色列DDS门禁系统Amadeus5技术培训使用手册.pdf
- 说明分析柏林广场b21绿宝书.docx
- 17J008 挡土墙(重力式、衡重式、悬臂式)(最新).pdf
- 清洁生产与清洁生产审核(培训)演示文稿.ppt VIP
文档评论(0)