执行时间(latency等待时间).pptx

Performance Measurement 1;Performance Measurement 1;Performance Measurement 2;Make the Common Case Fast;Make the Common Case Fast;Amdahl’s Law 1;Amdahl’s Law 2;Amdahl’s Law 3;Amdahl’s Law 3;Amdahl’s Law 4;Amdahl’s Law can also be applied to compare two CPU design alternatives, for example :Implementations of floating-point(FP)square root vary significantly in performance, especially among processors designed for graphics. Suppose FP square root(FPSQR) is responsible for 20% of the execution time of a critical graphics benchmark. One proposal is to enhance the FPSQR hardware and speed up this operation by a factor of 10. The other alternative is just to try to make all FP instructions in the graphics processor run faster by a factor of 1.6; FP instructions are responseible for a total of 50% of the execution time for the application. Compare these two design alternatives.;Amdahl’s Law can also be applied to compare two CPU design alternatives, for example :Implementations of floating-point(FP)square root vary significantly in performance, especially among processors designed for graphics. Suppose FP square root(FPSQR) is responsible for 20% of the execution time of a critical graphics benchmark. One proposal is to enhance the FPSQR hardware and speed up this operation by a factor of 10. The other alternative is just to try to make all FP instructions in the graphics processor run faster by a factor of 1.6; FP instructions are responseible for a total of 50% of the execution time for the application. Compare these two design alternatives.;Answer: we can compare these two alternatives by comparing the speedups: Improving the performance of the FP operations overall is slightly better because of the higher frequency.;Amdahl’s Law 6;CPU Performance 1;CPU Performance 2;CPU Performance 3;CPU Performance 4;CPU Performance 5;CPU Performance 6;Improve CPU Performance 1;Improve CPU Performance 2;MIPS 1;MIPS 2;MIPS 3;MIPS 4;MIPS 5;MIPS 5;Other Measurements;Internet Resourc