- 1、本文档共16页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
错误的推理
11-1BS 彭秀秀
Exercise is good,so everybody should exercise.
No!
Exercise is good,so everybody should exercise.
No!
It means an argument based on an
unqualified generalization.
即将普遍规则运用于有特殊情况发生
的个别情形之中。
Fred, the Australian, stole my wallet.
Thus, all Australians are thieves.
No!
Fred, the Australian, stole my wallet.
Thus, all Australians are thieves.
No!
It applies a special case to general rule.
由个别情形来推断普遍规则.
McDonalds and KFC offer foods with little nutrition, and thus we cannot expect any fast food restaurant to provide us with nutritious foods.
No!
McDonalds and KFC offer foods with little nutrition, and thus we cannot expect any fast food restaurant to provide us with nutritious foods.
No!
The cause has no connection with the result.
原因和结果没有必然联系
He decided to give up all his decisions.
No!
When the premises of an argument contradict
each other, there can be no argument.
当论证的前提相互矛盾时,这立论便不能成立。
We hope youll accept our recommendations. We spent the last three months working extra time on it.
No!
The answer has no connection with the question.
Young children are like flowers---flowers should stay away from terrible weather to grow, so children need to get rid of everything negative.
No!
Making an analogy between different things.
If I had studied harder, I would definitely have passed that test .
No!
Drawing any supportable conclusion from a hyperthesis that is not ture.
My opponent is a notorious liar. You cant believe a word that he is going to say.
No!
My opponent is a notorious liar. You cant believe a word that he is going to say.
No!
Poisoning the Well, or speaking “against the man” rather than the issue , in which the premises may only make a personal attack on a person who holds some thesis, instead of offering grounds showing why what he says is false.
Thank you!
Thank you!
Thank you!
Thank you!
文档评论(0)