- 1、本文档共83页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
PAGE
PAGE #
历年英语六级阅读真题(2012,6…2006,12)
2012年12月英语六级阅读真题
(1) Passage One
Amid all the job losses of the Great Recession, there is one category of worker that the economic disruption has been good for: nonhumans.
From self-service checkout lines at the supermarket to industrial robots armed with saws and taught to carve up animal carcassesin slaughter-houses, these ever-more-intelligent machines are now not just assisting workers but actually kicking them out of their jobs.
Automation isn Jut st affecting factory workers, either. Some law firms now use artificial intelligence software to scan and read mountains of legal documents, work that previously was performed by highly paid human lawyers.
Robotscontinue to have an impact on blue-collar jobs, and whitecollarjobs are under attack by microprocessors, sa” ys Edward Learner, an economics professor at UCLA s Anderson School of Management and director of the UCLA Anderson Forecast, a survey of the U.S. and California economies. Learner says the recession permanently wiped out 2.5 million jobs. U.S. gross domestic product has climbed back to prerecession levels, meaning we re producin
much as before, only with 6 percent fewer workers. To be sure, robotics are not the only job killers out there, with outsourcing stealing far more
gigs than automation.
Jeff Burnstein, president of the Robotics Industry Association, a
trade group in Ann Arbor, Mich., argues that robots actually save U.S.
jobs. His logic: companies that embrace automation might use fewer still
workers, but thatbestter than firing everyone and moving the work overseas.
workers, but that
It *s not that robots are cheaper than humans, though often they are.
It *s that they are better.“In some cases the quality requireme
It *s that they are better.
stringent that even if you wanted to have a human do the job, you couldn t, ” Burnstein says.
Same goes for surgeons, who are using robotic systems to perform an ever-growing list of operations—not because t
文档评论(0)