《统计学基础（英文版·第7版）》教学课件les7e_ppt_11_03.pptx

Chapter;Chapter Outline;Section 11.3;Section 11.3 Objectives;The Kruskal-Wallis Test;The Kruskal-Wallis Test;The Kruskal-Wallis Test;Performing a Kruskal-Wallis Test;Performing a Kruskal-Wallis Test;Performing a Kruskal-Wallis Test;Performing a Kruskal-Wallis Test;Example: Performing a Kruskal-Wallis Test;Example: Performing a Kruskal-Wallis Test;Solution: You want to test the claim that the distribution of the numbers of crimes reported in at least one precinct is different from the others. The null and alternative hypotheses are as follows. H0: The distribution of the numbers of crimes  reported is the same in all three precincts. Ha: The distribution of the numbers of crimes  reported in at least one precinct is different  from the others. (Claim);The test is a right-tailed test with a = 0.01 and d.f. = k – 1 = 3 – 1 = 2. From Table 6 in Appendix B, the critical value is ?02 = 9.210. The rejection region is ?2 9.210. Before calculating the test statistic, you must find the sum of the ranks for each sample. ;Solution: Performing a Kruskal-Wallis Test;The sum of the ranks for each sample is as follows. R1 = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5.5 + 8.5 + 8.5 + 13 + 14 + 17.5 = 77 R2 = 5.5 + 10 + 11 + 12 + 15 + 20.5 + 23 + 24.5 + 26 + 29.5 = 177 R3 = 7 + 16 + 17.5 + 19 + 20.5 + 22 + 24.5 + 27 + 28 + 29.5 = 211 ;Solution: Performing a Kruskal-Wallis Test;The figure shows the location of the rejection region and the test statistic H. Because H is in the rejection region, you reject the null hypothesis. There is enough evidence at the 1% level of significance to support the claim that the distribution of the numbers of crimes reported in at least one precinct is different from the others.