- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
2021-2022学年北京海淀区上学期期中全区统考阅读D篇分析与解析 讲义
无论从英语教材课文设计还是英语考试考题涵盖,可知英语犹如encyclopedia帮助我们普及方方面面知识,从人文到社科,从生活点滴到时政要闻,从前沿科技再到当今世界周遭的棘手而又亟待解决的问题,辅助打开通往外域和各个学术领域的大门。从2020高考AI(人工智能)与AGI(通用人工智能),到2021的a new approach to timekeeping that’s connected to circumstances on our planet, conditions that might change as a result of global warming,皆是当今时代共同关注的话题,既有对问题的前瞻,又可引发大家深思。
总有朋友称,英语除了不学古文,无所不包。
咱们看看海淀高三的上学期期中全区统考的D篇所涉及的问题吧。
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
1
I was at the Gathering for Science in Boston, on 22April 2017, as were 70,000 other scientists. We were there to stand up for facts and truth.
?
科学家们在科学大会上信誓旦旦承诺为事实和真理挺身而出(stand up for facts and truth)仍言犹在耳。
??? ???????????????????????????
2
Where are the crowds of scientists now? Since then, harms from science denial have only increased: global suffering has grown owing to inaction on climate change, and some epidemics have risen along with vaccine skepticism.
Where are the crowds of scientists now??而今这七万之众的科学家哪儿去了?此问可谓发人深省。作者在此为何会问及如此尖锐的问题?原因在于harms from science denial have only increased,来自否认科学也即反智的危害只增不减。具体的危害global suffering has grown owing to inaction on climate change, and some epidemics have risen along with vaccine skepticism。
作为两个反智的特例及其危害极具代表性,此处提及也为下文埋下伏笔。当然,从信息积累角度,要抓inaction on climate change和vaccine skepticism。类似信息会循环往复地出现在英语阅读材料当中。
??? ??????????????????????????
3
Ive been out there talking to the science deniers, and Ive asked my scientist friends to come with?me. Those people just arent worth talking to, they’ll say. I wouldnt make?a? difference anyway. Thats wrong. Those people can and do change their minds, although it requires someone to put in the time to overcome distrust.
科学家们面对否认科学也即反智的隐忧无外乎两点:Those people just arent worth talking to和?I wouldnt make?a?difference anyway。针对此,作者的回答更是掷地有声:Thats wrong。改变反科学者是可能的,前提在于有人投入时间来克服不信任。
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ????4
To be sure, many experts have launched themselves against misinformation, enduring abuse on social media and even threa
文档评论(0)