(2.5.7)--耳鸣评价量表的临床应用.pdfVIP

  • 30
  • 0
  • 约1.96万字
  • 约 5页
  • 2022-07-16 发布于广东
  • 举报
耳鸣的诊断与治疗专题 Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2018.06.003 耳鸣评价量表的临床应用 Clinical Values of Tinnitus Evaluation Questionnaire 【 】耳鸣评价量表(tinnitus evaluation questionnaire,TEQ)是由中国临床医生在长期的耳鸣诊疗实践工作中研 摘要 发的一个耳鸣评估工具,其研发思路与源自国外的众多耳鸣自评量表(self-report tinnitus questionnaire,SRTQ)在条目 的来源、问卷包含的范围及采集信息方式等3方面有着本质的区别。近10年来在不同研究单位进行的多次应用性研究显示: TEQ具有良好的内部一致性信度(Cronbach’s α系数≥0.76)及重测信度(≥0.94);TEQ与中文版耳鸣残疾量表(tinnitus handicap inventory,THI)的评估结果相关系数≥0.73,而TEQ的评估时间较THI缩短了三分之二;TEQ具有非常理想的 反应度及稳定的最小临床有意义变化值。实践表明,TEQ具有全面而简洁、准确而可靠的的特点,适合临床医生对耳鸣患者 进行耳鸣程度分级与疗效评估 【 】耳鸣;耳鸣评价量表;耳鸣评估;耳鸣自评量表 关键词 【 】 Abstract Tinnitus Evaluation Questionnaire (TEQ) is an assessment tool developed by a Chinese medical doctor after long-term practice of clinical tinnitus diagnosis and treatment. Development thoughts are entirely different from self-report tinnitus questionnaires (SRTQ) originated from the western world. The differences lie in three aspects including item source, questionnaire content and administration method. Clinical research results from different hospitals over the last 10 years have shown the following findings: 1. The internal consistency of TEQ is good (Cronbach’s α≥0.76). 2. Test-retest reliability is good (≥0.94). 3. The correlation co-efficiency between the TEQ and THI is ≥0.73. 4. The assessment time of TEQ is 2/3 less than that of THI. 5. TEQ has ideal responsiveness and stable minimum clinical meaningful change score (MCMCS). The clinical application practice after many years has proved that TEQ is comprehensive, simple, accurate and reliable while it is suitable for medical doctors to assess tinnitus severity and treatment outcome of patients even under heavy clinical workload. TEQ has become a good tinnitus assessment tool recommended by clinical doctors in both Western and Traditional Chinese

文档评论(0)

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档