超声引导可视无痛人流与传统人工流产术的临床效果比对（临床医学论文资料）.doc

超声引导可视无痛人流与传统人工流产术的临床效果比对（临床医学论文资料） 文档信息 ： 文档作为关于“医学心理学”中“妇产科学”的参考范文，为解决如何写好实用应用文、正确编写文案格式、内容素材摘取等相关工作提供支持。正文6055字，doc格式，可编辑。质优实惠，欢迎下载！ 目录 TOC \o "1-9" \h \z \u 目录 1 正文 1 文1：超声引导可视无痛人流与传统人工流产术的临床效果比对 1 1资料与方法 3 1.2手术方法 4 2 结果 5 3 讨论 8 文2：人工流产术的心理护理 9 1 术前心理护理 9 2 术中心理护理 10 3 术后心理护理 11 参考文摘引言： 11 原创性声明（模板） 12 正文 超声引导可视无痛人流与传统人工流产术的临床效果比对（临床医学论文资料） 文1：超声引导可视无痛人流与传统人工流产术的临床效果比对 The clinical effect of ultrasound-guided visual painless abortion was compared with that of traditional induced abortion [abstract] : objective to observe and compare the clinical effect of ultrasound-guided visual painless abortion and traditional induced abortion.Method to choose between December 2017 and December 2018， our hospital outpatient service of department of gynaecology treated voluntarily end pregnancy， 88 cases of patients with induced abortion， according to the patient's wishes， it can be pided into research group and the control group， each group of 44 cases， control group were treated by ordinary painless abortion， group were treated by ultrasound guided visualization painless abortion， comparison of two groups of patients with operation time， intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complicatio.Results the operative time and intraoperative blood loss in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group， and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The incidence of complicatio including postoperative uterine perforation， uterine iufficiency or leakage， cervical or uterine adhesion， and postoperative infection in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (6.81% vs. 29.53%)， with statistically significant differences (P<0.05).Conclusion compared with the traditional painless abortion， the visual painless abortion guided by ultrasound has the advantages of shorter operation time， less intraoperative blood loss and less postoperative complicatio. 【 key words 】 : ultrasound;Painl