论共犯脱离论文.pdfVIP

本科生毕业论文 论共犯脱离 姓 名 学　　号 专　　业 指导教师 2022 年 3 月 1 日 摘 要 基于实践中的刑事犯罪案件的多样性，如何界定共同犯罪过程中，中途放弃犯罪行 为的刑事责任？日本学者大塚仁提出了新的刑事理论，即共犯脱离。该理论能够弥补我 国刑法规定的不足，对于部分共犯脱离犯罪的行为进行刑事责任的认定，理论界通常是 比照犯罪中止理论，按照 “部分实行全部责任”原则，要求脱离者需要对犯罪后果承担 责任，而脱离行为并不会对罪名认定产生影响，其仅仅是作为量刑情节的考量，该种考 量方式将过多的刑事责任赋予脱离者，难以对脱离者的行为进行合理的刑事评价，也无 法实现行为与罪名的相一致。因此在日本学者提出共犯脱离理论后，我国学者也纷纷深 入研究。应整合规范的因果关系遮断说与共谋射程理论的优势，将共犯脱离独立于犯罪 中止，作为独立的理论进行研究。鉴于此，本文基于以往理论成果为立足点，以共犯脱 离理论为探讨对象，开展该理论与我国刑事理论的融合性探讨，试图将该理论引入到我 国刑法体系中，并进一步的开展实证分析，开展共犯脱离理论的实践化应用。 关键词：[共同犯罪；共犯脱离；犯罪中止] I Abstract The concept of accomplice disengagement was first proposed by Japanese scholar Hitoshi Otsuka. Its purpose is to reasonably solve the criminal responsibility problem of some accomplices who voluntarily give up committing a crime and make appropriate efforts to prevent the outcome of the crime in the process of joint crime, but still fail to prevent the outcome.The phenomenon of accomplice detachment also exists in our judicial practice, but there is no clear stipulation in our criminal law. As for the effectiveness of partial accomplice members cessation of crime, the theoretical circle usually deals with it according to the general theory of partial implementation of full responsibility according to the theory of cessation of crime, and only considers the situation of separation as the circumstances of discretionary sentencing.This kind of practice is obviously too harsh to those who break away, and will violate the principle of adaptation of crime to punishment in our country. With the in