_室内甲醛检测方法的比较与讨论.pdfVIP

广 东 化 工 2018 年 第3 期 · 36 · 第45 卷总第365 期 室内甲醛检测方法的比较与讨论 * 詹世景，朱美霞，陈榛宏，钟海鸣，郑海玮，莫嘉奇，朱祝维，成炎芳，吕京美，杜武青 (北京理工大学珠海学院 材料与环境学院，广东 珠海 519085) [摘 要]本文通过对乙酰丙酮分光光度法、AHMT 分光光度法和酚试剂分光光度法这三种方法进行实验原理、检出限、可操作性、优缺点、 3 标准曲线及标准样品结果的对比，发现：酚试剂分光光度法反应历程较为简单，最低检出浓度为0.01 mg/m ，可操行性强，相比其它两种方法 综合适用性更好，且相对误差在允许范围内。所以酚试剂分光光度法较适合用于室内甲醛的检测。 [关键词]室内甲醛；酚试剂分光光度法；AHMT 分光光度法；乙酰丙酮分光光度法 [中图分类号]X830.2 [文献标识码]A [文章编号]1007-1865(2018)03-0036-02 Comparison and Discussion of the Determination Methods of Indoor Formaldehyde * Zhan Shijing, Zhu Meixia, Chen Zhenhong, Zhong Haiming, Zheng Haiwei, Mo Jiaqi, Zhu Zhuwei, Cheng Yanfang, Lv Jingmei, Du Wuqing (School of Materials and Environment Beijing Institute of Technology, Zhuhai 519085, China) Abstract: Three methods for determination of indoor formaldehyde, the Acetylacetone Spectrophotometry, AHMT spectrophotometry and MBTH spectrophotometry, were compared in the experimental principle, detection limit, feasibility, advantages and disadvantages, standard curve and standard sample results. The results show that the MBTH method was more suitable for indoor formaldehyde detection with more simple reaction process, strong operability, the 3 lowest detection limit of 0.01mg/m , and t