张浦镇综合行政执法改革研究.doc

PAGE I 摘 要 因我国传统社会制度和机构设置，乡镇各职能机构按照“条”专业领域在各自范围内行使行政执法权，这类执法行为虽专业性强，但易导致职能机构间权责交叉和执法空白，与之相反，乡镇综合行政执法权可以增强“块”的作用，按照属地管理理顺乡镇执法权限，填补执法空白。对此，2010年国务院确定全国首批25个经济发达行政体制改革试点镇试行改革，昆山市张浦镇为其中之一，乡镇综合行政执法改革开始推行。随后党的十八届三中、四中和十九届三中全会提出“深化行政执法体制改革，推进综合执法”，各地也根据自身实际情况进行了综合行政执法改革。 各地乡镇综合行政执法如何启动和推进改革、存在什么问题、如何解决并深化改革，成为了我国行政执法体制改革领域的重要实践课题和关注点。 昆山市张浦镇综合行政执法改革开始时间早，综合行使的执法权范围广，其改革路径适应性强。此外，张浦镇在实行权力下放、综合执法的同时，同步进行精简机构和完善公共服务，其改革模式具有充分的借鉴和参考意义。本文从整体性治理理论出发，利用文献分析法和个案分析法，论述张浦镇改革前的执法方式，分析政策的推动和实行、改革历程、纵横关系、执法机构设置、人员编制和“前台”+“后台”的新型部门架构等改革内容，再将其与其他改革模式相比较，以此来对昆山市张浦镇“扩权强镇”综合行政执法改革进行了全面的研究，进一步剖析得出张浦镇深化综合行政执法改革所面临的问题：法制建设相对滞后；纵横协调机制不够紧密；执法力量薄弱；保障机制不够健全。最后，针对综合行政执法过程中凸显的问题，本文在法律法规、运行机制、执行和监督保障四个方面提出了相应的对策和建议。 关键词：综合行政执法；乡镇改革；张浦镇 Abstract Because of the traditional social system and institutional setup in China, the functional organs of towns and townships exercise the power of administrative law enforcement within their respective scope according to vertical professional fields, although this kind of law enforcement behavior is highly professional, it is easy to lead to overlapping powers and responsibilities between functional agencies and law enforcement gaps. On the contrary, the township comprehensive administrative law enforcement power can enhance the horizontal role, according to the territorial management to straighten out the township law enforcement authority, to fill the law enforcement gap. In this regard, the State Council in 2010 identified the first 25 economically developed administrative system reform pilot town reform, Kunshan Zhangpu Town as one of them, township comprehensive administrative law enforcement reform began to carry out. Subsequently, the third and fourth sessions of the 18th CPC Central Committee and the third plenary session of the 19th CPC Central Committee proposed to deepen the reform of administrative law enforcement system and promote comprehensive law enforcement, and various places also carried out comprehensive administrative law enforcement refor