关节镜配合中药熏洗治疗肘关节骨化性肌炎的临床观察的中期报告.docxVIP

关节镜配合中药熏洗治疗肘关节骨化性肌炎的临床观察的中期报告.docx

  1. 1、本文档共2页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
关节镜配合中药熏洗治疗肘关节骨化性肌炎的临床观察的中期报告 摘要:目的:探讨关节镜配合中药熏洗治疗肘关节骨化性肌炎(EOA)的疗效。方法:选取2014年7月至2015年6月在本院诊治的60例EOA患者,随机分为治疗组和对照组各30例。治疗组给予关节镜下清刮、吸取关节内血性渗出液、软骨碎片、游离体等,然后用中药熏洗液行局部热敷泡洗;对照组给予非手术治疗。通过测定VAS评分、EPA评分、ROM、X线片骨赘吸收程度及不良反应出现情况进行随访。结果:治疗组和对照组总有效率分别为93.3%和70.0%,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗组VAS和EPA评分显著低于对照组(P0.05);治疗组ROM增加明显,X线片骨赘吸收程度高于对照组(P0.05);治疗组不良反应发生率低于对照组(P0.05)。结论:关节镜下治疗配合中药熏洗治疗EOA具有较好的疗效,是一种安全、有效的治疗方法。 关键词:关节镜;中药熏洗;肘关节骨化性肌炎 Introduction: Elbow osteoarthritis (EOA) is a common disease that can cause pain, impaired function, and reduced quality of life. Current treatments for this condition include non-surgical interventions and surgery. However, some patients may not respond well to these treatments or may have adverse reactions to medications. As a result, alternative therapies are being explored, including the use of traditional Chinese medicine. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of joint arthroscopy combined with traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of EOA. We hypothesized that this approach would be safe and effective in reducing pain, improving function, and promoting healing. Methods: We enrolled 60 patients with EOA who were treated at our hospital between July 2014 and June 2015. The patients were randomly divided into a treatment group (n = 30) and a control group (n = 30). The treatment group underwent joint arthroscopy followed by local hot compress with traditional Chinese medicine, while the control group received non-surgical treatment. The effectiveness of the treatment was evaluated by assessing the following parameters: visual analogue scale (VAS) score, elbow performance score (EPA), range of motion (ROM), degree of bone spur absorption on X-rays, and incidence of adverse reactions. Results: The overall effective rate was 93.3% in the treatment group and 70.0% in the control group, with a significant difference between the two groups (P 0.05). The VAS and EPA scores were significantly lower in the treatment group than in the control g

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

kuailelaifenxian + 关注
官方认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

认证主体太仓市沙溪镇牛文库商务信息咨询服务部
IP属地上海
统一社会信用代码/组织机构代码
92320585MA1WRHUU8N

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档