多元化纠纷解决机制法理学研究.docVIP

多元化纠纷解决机制的法理学研究 中文摘要 纠纷和纠纷解决作为人类社会的基本活动，伴随着人类社会发展至今，无论 是在理论上还是实践上，都已经形成了相应的理论体系和行为模式。但是，自 20 世纪 60 年代以来，社会的发展不断的冲击着原有的社会关系和社会结构，使 纠纷的发展呈现多元化和复杂化，甚至是综合性的纠纷。因此，现有的以诉讼为 主导的纠纷解决模式，已经不能适应多元化纠纷发展需要，更不能满足大众基本 权利救济的的需求。从而，导致纠纷解决面临新的危机和挑战，所以，亟需探索 诉讼和非诉讼纠纷解决机制相结合的多元、高效模式。 每一项制度的建立和存在背后，都隐藏着一定的价值基础，在传统的法学研 究领域主要是围绕着诉讼和非诉讼机制两个层面来研究。为进一步完善我国的多 元化纠纷解决机制，本文从法理学、法社会学、法人类学等领域入手，从纠纷和 纠纷解决的基本概念出发，探究多元化纠纷解决机制的理念和基本原理，阐明当 代非诉讼纠纷解决机制的概念和类型；通过对权利救济理论、社会控制理论、法 律局限性、正义、效率、自由理论进行解释，从法理基础、价值基础和现实基础 三个方面，论证多元化纠纷解决机制的合理性和正当性，试图为多元化纠纷解决 机制提供一种符合我国现实的社会理论解释，为完善我国多元化纠纷解决机制与 和谐社会建设提供一个新的视角。通过理论结合实践，通过多维度、多视角的分 析、考察我国多元化纠纷解决机制存在和运行现状，有针对性地提出完善我国多 元化纠纷解决机制的立法及新的运行模式，使调解、仲裁、行政裁决等非诉讼纠 纷解决机制在纠纷解决中发挥应有的作用。从而，达到发展和完善我国多元化纠 纷解决机制的目的。  关键词：权利救济  纠纷解决  多元化纠纷解决机制 I Diversified the jurisprudence of the dispute settlement mechanism Abstract With the development of human society,disputes and dispute resolution, as the basic activities of human society, so far, has formed the theoretical system and behavior patterns both in theory and practice. However, since the 1960s, the development of society has constantly impacted on the existing social relationships and social structures, the disputes have been diversified and complicated, or even comprehensive. Therefore, the resolution mode of the litigation dispute has been unable to meet the need of diversified disputes , or even the needs of the basic right relief of the general public ,which leads to facing a new crisis and challenge for the  dispute resolution. Therefore,  it’s necessary to explore the diversified and efficient  resolution mechanism which combines the litigation disputes with the non-litigation ones . The establishment and the presence of a system has its value. The traditional legal research is mainly about the two aspects of litigation and non-litigation mechanism. In order to further improve Chinas diversified dispute resolution mechanism, this thesis, based on the jurisprudence, the sociology and anthropology of the law, and the basic co