《庄子集释》商榷.docVIP

摘  要  《庄子集释》是注释《庄子》的集大成之作。郭庆藩很注重文字、音韵、训 诂的考释，在字词注释和校勘等方面都代表了《庄子》研究至清代的最高水准。 后人注《庄》多是以此为底本。但是一部这样的大著作，不可避免的会有考证上 的失误，并且不可能不受到历史时代和个人的局限。本人不揣浅陋，在此指出其 可商榷之处，望能对《庄》学作出一点贡献。《集释》在释义、校勘、句读方面 均存在一些可商榷之处。释义方面，有些释义有误，有些似是而非，未能切中要 害之处，有些应当解释的字词却未作出注解。校勘方面，可商榷之处有：校而有 误、当校而未校、不当校而校。句读方面存在一些误断的地方。对于《庄子集释》 中引用的卢文弨、俞樾、郭嵩焘等人的见解，本文一律视为郭庆藩本人的见解， 并且对这部分文字加以论述。本文重在考辩，借《庄子集释》这本书，阐述自己 在品读《庄子》时的一点心得体会。本文采用的是札记形式，对释文或辩或证， 所以范围上只对全书的部分注释文字进行考辩，而不是对全书的所有注释文字进 行穷尽性的研究。本文采取的主要研究方法是：1、联系上下文考证词的确切涵 义。2、《庄子》内部的异文比较和与其他版本的异文比较。3、运用各种词典、 字典、训诂等工具书。本文运用校勘学、文献学、训诂学、考据学的方法，结合 相关文化背景知识，对《庄子》中的一些词语进行考证，以期对深入研究《庄子》 之旨有所裨益。 关键词：郭庆藩；庄子集释；训诂 Abstract ZhuangZi JiShi is the best edition of annotating Zhuang Zi.The author Guo QingFan was paid attenion to textual research of the characters,phonology and annotating. It have made great achievement in exegetical studies and collation untill Qing Dynasty.Later scholars always ues it for reproduction. However, such a great work, inevitably there will be errors on the textual research.He could be confined by historical and personal factors.I want to point out some questions that it could be discussed,though I am a beginner in this major.I hope to contribute to researching Zhuang Zi.There was many debates on explanation, collation and punctuation in ZhuangZi JiShi.In respect of explanation,firstly,it had some mistakes;Secondly, sometimes Guo QingFan gave the reader a specious argument or the argument can’t hit the point;The third,sometimes he didn’t give the explanation for the difficulty words that resders can’t understand.In the aspect of collation,we will see these cases: ZhuangZi JiShi mistaken collation,neglected the mistakes and collated some correct words or sentences. ZhuangZi JiShi also have some punctuation mistakes.The author Guo QingFan quoted many people’s opinions,such as Lu WenChao,Yu Yue,Guo SongTao.We regard them as Guo QingFan’s opinions,and dissertate them.This paper will pay attenion to the textual research.Through this book,I want to express my