葡萄糖与糖化血红蛋白检测在糖尿病诊断中的应用比较的论文.docVIP

葡萄糖与糖化血红蛋白检测在糖尿病诊断中的应用比较的论文.doc

  1. 1、本文档共16页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
--(完美WORD文档DOC格式,可在线免费浏览全文和下载)值得下载!

葡萄糖与糖化血红蛋白检测在糖尿病诊断中的应用比较 摘要 目的 比较使用空腹血葡萄糖与糖化血红蛋白在糖尿病(DM)诊断中的关系。方法对188例未诊断糖尿病的对象,同时检测空腹血葡萄糖(FPG)和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)。分别按1999年WHO诊断糖尿病标准(FPG≥7.0mmol/L)和美国糖尿病协会新标准(HbA1c≥6.5%),对研究对象进行分组(DM和非DM组),比较两个检测指标在诊断DM中的差异。以FPG为诊断DM金标准,计算HbA1c诊断DM的灵敏度、特异性、预期值、似然比等诊断性能。结果 以FPG和HbA1c相应的标准诊断糖尿病:①FPG均值:在2组DM患者之间有统计学差异(P<0.05),在2组非DM患者之间则无统计学差异(P>0.05)。②HbA1c均值:在2组DM组无统计学差异(P>0.05),在2组非DM组有统计学差异(P<0.05)。③HbA1c诊断糖尿病性能:灵敏度100%、特异性93%、阴性似然比0.00和阳性似然比14.28。结论 与FPG相比较,HbA1C诊断糖尿病有极高的诊断灵敏度和特异性,是具有纳入和排除糖尿病诊断的理想实验指标。 关键词:葡萄糖,糖化血红蛋白,糖尿病 COMPARISON BETWEEN THE FASTING PLASMA GLUCOSE AND GLYCATED HEMOGLOBIN A1C TESTING IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF DIABETES MELLITUS ABSTRACT To compare the relationship between fasting plasma glucose(FPG)and glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) testing in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. The levers of FPG and HbA1c in 188 subjects with undiagnosed diabetes mellitus were measured at the same time. The DM and non-DM groups were classified according to the standard (FPG ≥ 7.0mmol / L) of WHO for diagnosing DM in 1999 and the new standard (HbA1c ≥ 6.5%) of the American Diabetes Association for diagnosing DM,respectively. The two kinds of testings in DM and non-DM groups were compared in the diagnosis of DM. The sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios of HbA1c for diagnostic performance were calculated with the current gold standard for diagnosis of DM. The results of FPG and HbA1c were as follows:①For means of FPG measurements, there were significant difference between two DM groups(P<0.05)and no significant difference in two non-DM groups(P>0.05). ②For means of HbA1c measurements, there were significant difference in two DM groups(P<0.05)and no significant difference between two non-DM groups(P>0.05). ③The sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios of HbA1c for diagnostic performance were 100%, 93%, 0.00 and 14.28,respectively.HbA1C had high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis of diabetes compared with FPG and was a newly ideal indicator for both inclusion and exclus

文档评论(0)

wpxuang12 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档